https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #48 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Berrehouc Nicolas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|nberreh...@free.fr |
Robert Scheck changed:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Johan Cwiklinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #24 from Matěj Cepl 2012-03-06 18:03:37 EST ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> I've been recently working on an upgrade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Johan Cwiklinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #22 from Matěj Cepl 2012-03-06 17:07:32 EST ---
Reporter, if you reopen this review, I would gladly make you review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Bug 551765 depends on bug 551763, which changed state.
Bug 551763 Summary: Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #21 from Matej Cepl 2011-04-14 12:08:08 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Wouldn't it be worthy to keep prosody an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Jan Kaluža changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #19 from Matej Cepl 2011-04-04 07:06:59 EDT ---
Wouldn't it be worthy to keep prosody and lua-spec packages at least
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #18 from Adam Goode 2011-03-06 14:40:34 EST ---
Good news, maybe IPv6 is coming in luasocket?
http://code.google.co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #17 from Johan Cwiklinski 2011-02-24 10:23:57 EST
---
As far as I know, Prosody can be compiled without lua-sec ; b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #16 from Matej Cepl 2011-02-24 06:10:40 EST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Please reopen if prosody can be built wi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #15 from Adam Goode 2011-02-23 15:07:13 EST ---
Please reopen if prosody can be built without lua-sec.
--
Configur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Bug 551765 depends on bug 551763, which changed state.
Bug 551763 Summary: Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Johan Cwiklinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #13 from Johan Cwiklinski 2011-02-23 02:08:11 EST
---
I no longer maintain any package in Fedora repositories ; wha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #12 from Johan Cwiklinski 2010-12-11 06:18:21 EST
---
A new version (fedora only for now) that fix a build issue on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #11 from Johan Cwiklinski 2010-09-11 03:37:12 EDT
---
Ok, here is the new version (this one is only for Fedora, usi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #10 from Johan Cwiklinski 2010-09-11 01:04:03 EDT
---
Ok, that iss in fact documented on Fedora's wiki:
https://fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Saou 2010-09-09 16:38:22
EDT ---
About the /var/lib/prosody : If you test on EL-5 you'll see what
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #8 from Johan Cwiklinski 2010-09-09 13:45:37 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> My first guess is that you should a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Saou 2010-09-09 12:58:13
EDT ---
The missing /var/lib/prosody might also be because I have /usr/co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Matthias Saou changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #5 from Johan Cwiklinski 2010-07-14 18:44:03 EDT
---
Indeed that should be a good solution.
Anyways, since nobody
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
Adam Goode changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #3 from Johan Cwiklinski 2010-07-14 04:40:59 EDT
---
I've upgraded to the latest stable version (0.7.0):
Spec URL:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765
--- Comment #2 from Johan Cwiklinski 2010-05-01 18:14:06 EDT
---
I've upgraded to the latest stable version (0.6.2):
Spec URL:
30 matches
Mail list logo
