[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2012-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2012-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2011-03-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-12-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 Gary Byers changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-12-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #18 from Alexander Kahl 2010-12-12 08:40:47 EST --- Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/ccl/ccl.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-12-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-02 13:41:20 EST --- OK, after more checking, the package requires executable heap,

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-12-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-02 13:30:43 EST --- I talked to the selinux folks who are quite surprised that any

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-11-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #15 from Alexander Kahl 2010-11-26 11:20:10 EST --- Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/ccl/ccl.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-11-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #14 from Alexander Kahl 2010-11-26 11:11:24 EST --- Hey Jason, let's go: (In reply to comment #12) > ccl.x86_64:

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-11-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 Alexander Kahl changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-11-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-11-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-17 10:00:10 EST --- I don't know if Jerry intends to get back to this at some point

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-08-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Kahl 2010-08-05 04:15:17 EDT --- Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/ccl/ccl.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-08-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2010-08-04 14:57:13 EDT --- I am still interested in the SIG. Sorry, between vacation and a h

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-07-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kahl 2010-07-22 11:48:35 EDT --- Oh.. I just realized PPC isn't supported as a primary architectur

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-07-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kahl 2010-07-21 15:09:09 EDT --- Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/ccl/ccl.spec SRPM URL: ht

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-03-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James 2010-03-09 11:41:40 EST --- I sent a query off to Josh Boyer and then forgot about it. If it w

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-03-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kahl 2010-03-09 11:20:24 EST --- Bingo: I've managed to acquire an old PowerBook G4 at work and fi

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-03-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kahl 2010-03-09 04:41:09 EST --- About #3/DWARF: Thank you for the insight! About #4: Any update o

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-02-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James 2010-02-25 12:44:47 EST --- It was Josh Boyer who gave me an account. Unfortunately, I can't r

[Bug 562226] Review Request: ccl - Free Common Lisp implementation

2010-02-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562226 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added ---