Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Thomas Kowaliczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Thomas Kowaliczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #46 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2010-10-06
17:27:41 EDT ---
Is that here done? Can it anyone close it?
--
Configure bu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #45 from Roman Galkin 2010-08-26 04:57:17 EDT
---
Very-very thanks, Andreas. This package work fine without any add
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #44 from Andreas Osowski 2010-08-25 15:55:39
EDT ---
See the linked build, but yes, as you can see at
http://koji.f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #43 from Roman Galkin 2010-08-25 15:47:12 EDT
---
Is package "mumble" contain "mumble-server" aka "murmur"?
--
Co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System
2010-08-25 14:56:31 EDT ---
mumble-1.2.2-10.fc13 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #41 from Roman Galkin 2010-08-25 12:34:59 EDT
---
> Therefore, I'm most likely going to push the update later today
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #40 from Roman Galkin 2010-08-24 08:02:46 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #39)
> I have been waiting for a reply on an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #39 from Andreas Osowski 2010-08-24 07:48:34
EDT ---
I have been waiting for a reply on another bug report before p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Roman Galkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Bug 567094 depends on bug 593238, which changed state.
Bug 593238 Summary: Please drop dependency on redhat-lsb
https://bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Chen Lei changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #37 from John Schmitt 2010-05-13 22:42:31 EDT
---
murmur-1.2.2-7.fc12.x86_64 from updates-testing works for me.
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #36 from John Schmitt 2010-05-10 17:54:53 EDT
---
1) I saw only 1.2.2-6, not 1.2.2-7
2) Make sure redhat-lsb is ins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-10 17:50:12 EDT ---
mumble-1.2.2-7.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 test
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-10 13:06:19 EDT ---
mumble-1.2.2-7.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 test
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-09 10:54:26 EDT ---
mumble-1.2.2-7.fc12 has been submitted as an update for F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System
2010-05-09 10:23:13 EDT ---
mumble-1.2.2-7.fc13 has been submitted as an update for F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #31 from John Schmitt 2010-05-06 22:49:23 EDT
---
After installing redhat-lsb and hacking the init script, the serv
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #30 from John Schmitt 2010-05-06 14:42:34 EDT
---
Should murmur depend on the redhat-lsb RPM? On cursory examinati
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #29 from Andreas Osowski 2010-05-03 13:54:21
EDT ---
Uh, are you on F13 / which arch?
Just do a mockbuild (or do a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #28 from Andreas Osowski 2010-05-03 10:19:42
EDT ---
Sorry for the delay.
just to make sure, could you test-run the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #27 from Andreas Osowski 2010-04-30 02:09:51
EDT ---
No, you were clear.
However, for a proper fix and to stick wit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #26 from Andreas Osowski 2010-04-30 01:50:54
EDT ---
Hello John,
I'm sorry about that.
Apparently I overlooked that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
John Schmitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System
2010-04-18 08:24:00 EDT ---
mumble-1.2.2-6.fc13 has been submitted as an update for F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Edward Rudd changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Andreas Osowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Thomas Kowaliczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #18 from Andreas Osowski 2010-04-11 13:55:21
EDT ---
I'm sorry, I thought I had already posted the updated spec in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Thomas Kowaliczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2010-03-28
14:57:06 EDT ---
And what about the other warnings? Can you fix it?
--
Conf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Osowski 2010-03-28 13:45:45
EDT ---
Hello.
Thanks for reviewing the package so far.
Regarding cel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-03-28
11:49:09 EDT ---
%{_libdir}/%{name}/libXXX.so is under %{_libdir}/%{name}, not
di
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2010-03-28
11:31:27 EDT ---
About that:
MUST: If a package contains library files with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2010-03-28
10:27:20 EDT ---
On this things i need answers.
MUST: rpmlint must be run on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2010-03-28
10:30:18 EDT ---
Mamoru Tasaka i need your help here please :)
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Thomas Kowaliczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2010-03-28
10:25:16 EDT ---
MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2010-03-28
09:41:27 EDT ---
This can be fixed too:
[linuxdon...@localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Thomas Kowaliczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #6 from Julian G 2010-03-23 20:22:02 EDT ---
I've backported some changes from Mary Ellen Foster to the spec file an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Leszek Matok changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Thomas Kowaliczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Osowski 2010-03-23 09:14:14 EDT
---
Spec file: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/mumble-1.2.2-3/mumble
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
Thomas Kowaliczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567094
--- Comment #1 from Julian G 2010-02-22 18:10:28 EST ---
I've made some changes to the spec file:
http://files.4-web.net/mumble/
52 matches
Mail list logo
