[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2011-02-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-07 12:54:39 EST --- skipfish-1.84-0.1.b.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPE

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2011-02-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2011-02-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #61 from Fedora Update System 2011-02-07 12:55:46 EST --- skipfish-1.84-0.1.b.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPE

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2011-02-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2011-01-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2011-01-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-23 15:26:35 EST --- skipfish-1.84-0.1.b.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2011-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-21 22:43:37 EST --- skipfish-1.84-0.1.b.el6 has been submitted as an update f

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2011-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-21 22:31:37 EST --- skipfish-1.84-0.1.b.el5 has been submitted as an update f

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2011-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System 2011-01-21 22:21:35 EST --- skipfish-1.84-0.1.b.fc14 has been submitted as an update

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-08-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-08-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-24 19:02:05 EDT --- skipfish-1.54-0.1.b.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPE

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-08-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-08-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-24 17:05:33 EDT --- skipfish-1.54-0.1.b.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-08-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-08-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-23 21:16:45 EDT --- skipfish-1.54-0.1.b.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-08-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-08 11:17:21 EDT --- skipfish-1.54-0.1.b.fc13 has been submitted as an update

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-08-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-08 11:17:14 EDT --- skipfish-1.54-0.1.b.el5 has been submitted as an update f

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-08-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System 2010-08-08 11:17:27 EDT --- skipfish-1.54-0.1.b.fc14 has been submitted as an update

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-06-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-30 10:23:27 EDT --- skipfish-1.32-0.4.b.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPE

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-06-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-06-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-06-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-09 11:46:27 EDT --- skipfish-1.32-0.4.b.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPE

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-05-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-05-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-10 19:52:49 EDT --- skipfish-1.32-0.4.b.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-05-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-05-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-10 13:09:13 EDT --- skipfish-1.32-0.4.b.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-08 19:55:40 EDT --- skipfish-1.32-0.4.b.fc12 has been submitted as an update

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-08 19:55:50 EDT --- skipfish-1.32-0.4.b.el5 has been submitted as an update f

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-08 19:55:45 EDT --- skipfish-1.32-0.4.b.el4 has been submitted as an update f

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2010-05-08 19:55:32 EDT --- skipfish-1.32-0.4.b.fc13 has been submitted as an update

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-05-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #41 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-05-03 22:46:26 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). -- Configure bugmail: http

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-05-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #38 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-28 19:00:47 EDT --- Hello Tomas, thanks for the fix of patch. It seems to work now.

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #36 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-27 12:37:09 EDT --- Hello Tomas, Something is wrong. If I compile the package with f

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #34 from Tomas Mraz 2010-04-27 05:32:33 EDT --- You're right that the ADD_STR_DATA is not correct. I'll look at this

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #33 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-26 23:42:45 EDT --- Please Tomas, are you sure about the ADD_STR_DATA macro? It is s

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #32 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-26 23:22:43 EDT --- Hello Tomas, thank you for the patch. Here is the package rebui

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #30 from Tomas Mraz 2010-04-26 16:48:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=409289) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #31 from Tomas Mraz 2010-04-26 16:50:10 EDT --- I forgot to add that the patch is untested. -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #29 from Tomas Mraz 2010-04-23 13:01:44 EDT --- You're right, that the ck_realloc would have to be changed to have p

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #22 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-20 20:44:11 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/fedora/12/SPECS/skipfish.

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #21 from Tomas Mraz 2010-04-20 10:03:35 EDT --- I'm sorry but I really dislike this split and I have to say that I r

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #20 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-20 09:53:04 EDT --- Hello Tomasi, I was following the recommendation from the licensi

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Tomas Mraz changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #18 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-18 06:53:35 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/fedora/12/SPECS/skipfish.

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #17 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-18 06:32:01 EDT --- Hello guys, yes I actually just came to the same conclusion, when

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #16 from Martin Gieseking 2010-04-18 03:20:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > and it has to own these, too > >

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-04-18 03:10:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > To be a bit more clearer, I suggest

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #13 from Martin Gieseking 2010-04-18 03:00:40 EDT --- To be a bit more clearer, I suggest to make the %files sectio

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking 2010-04-18 02:56:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Please could you specify what dir

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #11 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-17 22:08:54 EDT --- Hello Martin, thank you for review - here is the updated package.

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #10 from Martin Gieseking 2010-04-17 08:30:45 EDT --- Hi Michal, two additional remarks: - The header file string

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #9 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-17 07:52:10 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/fedora/12/SPECS/skipfish.s

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #8 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-09 22:41:34 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/skipfish.spec SRPM URL: http://re

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-04-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #7 from Michal Ambroz 2010-04-02 16:13:20 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/skipfish.spec SRPM URL: http://re

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #6 from Michal Ambroz 2010-03-29 08:24:35 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/skipfish.spec SRPM URL: http://re

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2010-03-29 05:16:54 EDT --- A couple of further remarks: - you can drop "%attr(755,root,r

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #4 from Michal Ambroz 2010-03-28 14:51:45 EDT --- Koji build for FC12 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?t

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #3 from Michal Ambroz 2010-03-28 13:50:31 EDT --- Updated to version 1.26b Incorporated changes to the specfile as s

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-03-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #1 from Michal Ambroz 2010-03-25 03:52:00 EDT --- Updated to version 1.25b SPEC URL: http://rebus.webz.cz/d/skipfish

[Bug 576431] Package Review: skipfish - Web application security scanner

2010-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added -