Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #62 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-10 16:36:06 EDT ---
spectrum-1.4.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #61 from Fedora Update System
2010-08-26 09:32:10 EDT ---
spectrum-1.4.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System
2010-08-13 02:05:37 EDT ---
spectrum-1.4.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System
2010-08-10 17:45:10 EDT ---
spectrum-0.3.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 st
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System
2010-07-21 12:10:25 EDT ---
spectrum-0.3.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System
2010-07-13 15:27:49 EDT ---
spectrum-0.3-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System
2010-07-13 14:51:59 EDT ---
spectrum-0.3-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #55 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-23 09:19:33 EDT ---
Built even for EL-6 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?task
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-22 13:18:41 EDT ---
spectrum-0.3-0.9.git20100614.fc13 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-21 21:11:22 EDT ---
spectrum-0.3-0.9.git20100614.el5 has been pushed to the F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-21 17:45:26 EDT ---
spectrum-0.3-0.9.git20100614.fc12 has been pushed to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-21 07:41:34 EDT ---
spectrum-0.3-0.9.git20100614.fc12 has been submitted as a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-21 07:30:11 EDT ---
spectrum-0.3-0.9.git20100614.fc13 has been submitted as a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-21 07:21:08 EDT ---
spectrum-0.3-0.9.git20100614.el5 has been submitted as an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #46 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-21 04:57:40 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> > New packages will not have bugzilla en
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #44 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-06-20 22:00:16 EDT ---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
Do you want a EL-6 branch a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #43 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-17 16:23:35 EDT ---
Just for the record ...
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #42 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-17 11:33:30
EDT ---
One more thing - beware of % signs in the changelog. You must u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #39 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-16 07:03:33 EDT ---
New version of the package is
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #38 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-15 14:52:10
EDT ---
Formal review of spectrum-0.3-0.7.git20100614:
Summary
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #37 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-14 19:03:27 EDT ---
The latest checkout from upstream (which builds on RHEL-5) together
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #36 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-12 16:45:41
EDT ---
I see no change in the permissions/ownership. You must have for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #35 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-12 12:03:37 EDT ---
patch to spec applied, new initscript included. RHEL-5 build is
http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #34 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-11 17:42:54
EDT ---
I rewrote the initscript to use spectrumctl. You can see it her
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #33 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-11 15:36:32
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=423382)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #32 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-11 13:22:54 EDT ---
Everything except of the new initscript done. Build in koji as
http:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #31 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-11 11:21:10
EDT ---
You forgot to maintain the %changelog.
rpmlint says:
> spectru
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #30 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-11 05:33:09 EDT ---
err, of course this patch should be applied for every build, not onl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #29 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-11 03:38:13 EDT ---
All three comments accepted, now builds even with running tests
http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #28 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-10 19:18:45
EDT ---
In the %check you build a test program, but you never execute i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #26 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-10 18:16:59
EDT ---
The build failure "undefined reference to
SpectrumRosterManager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #27 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-10 19:11:11
EDT ---
# git archive --prefix=spectrum/ HEAD | bzip2 >spectrum.tar.b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #25 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-08 09:18:15 EDT ---
> New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review proc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #24 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-08 04:32:30
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> > Both
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #22 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-07 18:32:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> My point was that sprinkling the spec fi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #21 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-07 18:14:05 EDT ---
BTW, builds without problems with Rawhide
http://koji.fedoraproject.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #20 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-07 13:06:28
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > I see
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #19 from Matej Cepl 2010-06-04 17:27:36 EDT ---
New build
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2230788
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #18 from Michal Schmidt 2010-05-31 10:06:20
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> RHEL-5 http://koji.fedoraproject.or
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #17 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-25 12:14:33 EDT ---
Upstream kindly provided patch to remove libgettextpo dependency
RH
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #16 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-25 11:04:12 EDT ---
Moved /usr/bin/spectrum to /usr/sbin
RHEL-5 build http://koji.fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #15 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-25 09:15:32 EDT ---
Issues in comment 11, comment 12 and many other small issues were pr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #13 from Michal Schmidt 2010-05-25 06:00:36
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> One more problem (but that's probabl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #14 from Michal Schmidt 2010-05-25 06:02:03
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Don't we need a special user "spect
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #11 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-24 18:46:40 EDT ---
Don't we need a special user "spectrum"? Any group?
--
Configure b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #12 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-24 18:48:55 EDT ---
Should also emphasize somewhere (%description? README.Fedora?) that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #10 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-24 18:28:23 EDT ---
Revised RHEL-5 build (no, I haven't bumped Release, sorry)
http://ko
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #9 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-24 18:27:17 EDT ---
I guess it casues installation of at least:
X cairo i386 1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-24 17:48:49 EDT ---
One more problem (but that's probably for upstream):
[r...@luther ~]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #7 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-19 03:40:48 EDT ---
Rawhide is build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #6 from Matej Cepl 2010-05-19 03:30:09 EDT ---
We have progress, 0.2 with some patches now builds on EPEL-5
http://k
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Bug 578480 depends on bug 582403, which changed state.
Bug 582403 Summary: Please add gloox to EPEL-5
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Matej Cepl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #5 from Michal Schmidt 2010-03-31 12:23:06
EDT ---
You have:
%defattr(-,root,root)
Current guidelines recommend:
%d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #4 from Michal Schmidt 2010-03-31 12:19:36
EDT ---
"%{_tmppath}/%{name}-root" is not an acceptable BuildRoot:
https
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #3 from Michal Schmidt 2010-03-31 12:09:46
EDT ---
Please use cmake in a more standardised way:
https://fedoraproje
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl 2010-03-31 10:49:48 EDT ---
New version built in koji
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #1 from Michal Schmidt 2010-03-31 09:22:39
EDT ---
Quickly spotted issues for now:
rpmbuild should have no problem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
69 matches
Mail list logo
