[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2014-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2014-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #39 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2014-08-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Troy Dawson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tdaw...@redhat.com Flags|fedo

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-02-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #36 from Jon Ciesla 2012-02-27 10:06:39 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https:/

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-02-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Mo Morsi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #34 from Shawn Starr 2012-02-23 17:22:02 EST --- Please do request commit, never can have enough maintainers :) eve

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #33 from Mo Morsi 2012-02-23 15:09:42 EST --- Could this be pushed into Fedora 16 as well. rubygem-webmock will be b

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2012-02-18 11:56:12 EST --- rubygem-addressable-2.2.6-3.fc17 has been submitted as an

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-02-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Shawn Starr changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-02-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #30 from Vít Ondruch 2012-02-14 04:07:37 EST --- Shawn, I took just quick look on the spec file and it looks good.

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #29 from Shawn Starr 2012-02-13 23:37:28 EST --- ping, can someone review? Some fixes have been made to rubygem-idn

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #28 from Shawn Starr 2012-02-09 23:07:59 EST --- I have an updated package for review: * Koji scratch build pass

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Bohuslav Kabrda changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Shawn Starr changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #25 from Shawn Starr 2012-01-29 15:12:19 EST --- Looks like this fails in rawhide now: DEBUG: Failures: DEBUG: 1

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla 2012-01-11 20:34:07 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https:/

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Shawn Starr changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-01-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #22 from Shawn Starr 2012-01-11 11:31:44 EST --- Can I get an update from the SCM team on this approval? -- Confi

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2012-01-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #21 from Shawn Starr 2012-01-02 15:06:30 EST --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ruby

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-12-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #20 from Shawn Starr 2011-12-20 12:40:32 EST --- I will be pushing this today was blocked due to fedora filer issue

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-12-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #19 from Shawn Starr 2011-12-08 15:06:25 EST --- Will push to git and build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzill

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-12-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #18 from Mo Morsi 2011-12-08 08:04:23 EST --- ping? Can we get this into Fedora / close this out now. Thanks alot.

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 James Laska changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-11-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #16 from Mo Morsi 2011-11-28 07:31:14 EST --- For some reason the '+' isn't available as an option for the fedora-re

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-11-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #15 from Shawn Starr 2011-11-21 22:32:16 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > Can someone change the flag to + I wil

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-11-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #14 from Shawn Starr 2011-11-21 22:28:50 EST --- Can someone change the flag to + I will submit package as soon as

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-11-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Mo Morsi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-11-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #12 from Vít Ondruch 2011-11-07 11:57:32 EST --- I did not checked the complete gem content, but the RSpec 2.x seem

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-11-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #11 from Shawn Starr 2011-11-06 01:41:15 EST --- This is updated from both feedback. It's still not RSpec 2.x thoug

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-11-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #10 from Shawn Starr 2011-11-03 19:23:17 EDT --- I'll fix the comments. But as I've said. Ruby is moving to 1.9.x w

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-11-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #9 from James Laska 2011-11-01 16:59:11 EDT --- Any updates? Shawn, while I'm not a ruby expert, I'm happy to help

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-10-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #8 from Shawn Starr 2011-10-19 20:19:10 EDT --- Pong, let me get to this on weekend or so. I still need to sync wit

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-10-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #7 from Mo Morsi 2011-10-18 09:28:55 EDT --- ping? Am getting regular broken dependencies emails regarding rubygem-w

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-10-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-10-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Mo Morsi changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 James Laska changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 James Laska changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-08-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #4 from Shawn Starr 2011-08-04 00:44:16 EDT --- NOW: Part of Dependency packaging for OpenNebula 2.x/3.x I have up

[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling

2011-07-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 Shawn Starr changed: What|Removed |Added ---