Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #54 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-05-05 11:35:40 EDT
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #51 from Dave Malcolm 2011-01-03 15:29:56 EST
---
Thanks; I've imported the sources into git and am trying a build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #50 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-03 14:36:50 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #47 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-23 15:27:08 EST
---
(In reply to comment #46)
> I was sorta waiting for the dust to s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #45 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-22 21:11:19 EST
---
(In reply to comment #44)
> I haven't yet addressed the sys.path
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #43 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-21 17:20:51 EST
---
pypy-1.4.1 was released earlier today, so I've updated pypy.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #42 from Maciej Fijalkowski 2010-12-18 12:57:46
EST ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> (In reply to comment #40)
> > w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #41 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-12-18
12:44:14 EST ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> well, it goes into "don't sh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #40 from Maciej Fijalkowski 2010-12-18 02:16:59
EST ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> (In reply to comment #37)
> > S
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #39 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-17 17:23:23 EST
---
Created attachment 469463
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #38 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-17 17:19:47 EST
---
(In reply to comment #37)
> Sure they are. However, they're not n
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #37 from Maciej Fijalkowski 2010-12-17 15:24:47
EST ---
Sure they are. However, they're not needed (or even advised
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #36 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-17 12:23:19 EST
---
(In reply to comment #35)
> (In reply to comment #34)
> > (In rep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #35 from Maciej Fijalkowski 2010-12-17 07:46:09
EST ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> (In reply to comment #33)
> > J
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #34 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-17 07:35:34 EST
---
(In reply to comment #33)
> JVM backend is not mature enough to b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #33 from Maciej Fijalkowski 2010-12-17 01:16:59
EST ---
JVM backend is not mature enough to be shipped. Btw: how di
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #32 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-16 20:45:39 EST
---
(In reply to comment #11)
...
> 1) License tag is better. dmalco
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #31 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-16 20:17:59 EST
---
The scratch build ran to completion. rpmlint on the resulting r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #30 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-16 18:46:59 EST
---
Here's what I've got so far:
Updated specfile:
http://fedorape
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #29 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-16 11:56:24 EST
---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Sorry, I've been away on vacation. L
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #28 from Maciej Fijalkowski 2010-12-15 01:13:56
EST ---
Hello.
I'll look into prefix thing at some point, it shoul
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #27 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-12-15
01:00:00 EST ---
Yeah, that's something I wanted to look into along with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #26 from Ed Marshall 2010-12-14 23:34:37 EST
---
Toshio, just a quick note: I ran a local mock build of the SRPM yo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #23 from Dave Malcolm 2010-12-13 20:15:59 EST
---
I've been working on improving the readability of the generated .
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #22 from Dave Malcolm 2010-11-30 17:03:49 EST
---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Okay, finally, a build that completes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #21 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-11-30
16:54:00 EST ---
Okay, finally, a build that completes:
http://koji.fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #20 from Maciej Fijalkowski 2010-11-29 13:02:01
EST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Hi, will write down responses bi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #19 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-11-29
11:18:28 EST ---
Maciej, thanks!
I don't know why we using --translation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #18 from Maciej Fijalkowski 2010-11-29 07:47:45
EST ---
Hello.
There was extra info just added that you might find
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #17 from Maciej Fijalkowski 2010-11-29 01:32:18
EST ---
Any reason for passing --translation-verbose? That kind of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #16 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-11-28
21:27:42 EST ---
Okay, that build didn't finish but it got past the build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #15 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-11-28
16:38:56 EST ---
New build started with the portion that would use our CF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #14 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-11-28
16:14:30 EST ---
Yeah, sounds good.
dmalcolm or maciej, the build.log ou
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-28 13:47:29 EST ---
Many items look fixed up, thanks Toshio. :)
However, the scratch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Maciej Fijalkowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-11-27
16:12:44 EST ---
I don't really want to be primary maintainer but I'd be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-11-21 16:02:51 EST ---
Any news on this?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #9 from Dave Malcolm 2010-07-19 10:52:08 EDT
---
Sorry, somewhat doomed right now with other tasks. See
http://lis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-18 14:14:03 EDT ---
Dave: Any news here? (No hurry, just wondering... ;)
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #7 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-06-02
12:56:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> a) Fixed by using 'and':
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Chen Lei changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-05-30 22:19:17 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #3 from Dave Malcolm 2010-05-05 10:41:15 EDT
---
The build successfully completed (took 4.5 hours)
Updated specfil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm 2010-05-04 18:07:19 EDT
---
Trying a scratch build into dist-f14, with r72073 patch cherrypick
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941
--- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm 2010-05-04 17:51:07 EDT
---
Issue (ii) above has been fixed in upstream SVN after the 1.2 tarb
55 matches
Mail list logo
