https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #39 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #38 from Matt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-24 17:55:50 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-17 08:23:47 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #35 from ch...@chris-keane.co.uk 2010-10-13 11:46:09 EDT ---
Thanks for the speedy attention.
Sure - I thought about
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #34 from Matthias Runge 2010-10-13
06:06:10 EDT ---
Thank you for your report. I'll take a deeper look into this la
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #33 from ch...@chris-keane.co.uk 2010-10-13 06:03:29 EDT ---
In confirmation of the above: simply replacing the invoc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
ch...@chris-keane.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System
2010-10-05 09:26:20 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System
2010-10-05 05:40:16 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-14 13:29:56 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-14 05:10:29 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-14 04:48:23 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-14 04:46:51 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-11 15:22:03 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-11 15:19:24 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-11 15:21:30 EDT ---
logcheck-1.3.13-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-09-10 14:47:03 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #18 from Matthias Runge 2010-09-07
15:57:51 EDT ---
Thanks for the review.
Some of those errors resp. warnings are
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson 2010-09-06 15:03:40
EDT ---
Sorry for the delay. There's a few issues that need to be addre
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2010-08-29 10:01:47
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> lockfile-progs (as last remaining d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #15 from Matthias Runge 2010-08-28
17:59:15 EDT ---
lockfile-progs (as last remaining dependency) is in -testing no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Bug 589867 depends on bug 602587, which changed state.
Bug 602587 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #13 from Paul Howarth 2010-06-10 07:47:48 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> > I wouldn't use "logcheck" as the de
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #12 from Matthias Runge 2010-06-10
07:12:40 EDT ---
> %{_datadir}/logtail/
That suits me better.
>
>
> I would
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Runge 2010-06-10
05:41:45 EDT ---
I've submitted all dependand packages for review, in total 5 de
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Runge 2010-06-10
05:22:09 EDT ---
I see, it looks like much work to review logcheck or it's depend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2010-06-08 05:29:10 EDT ---
Mohammed, no, I do not want take it form you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #7 from Mohammed Imran 2010-06-07 05:51:17 EDT
---
Hi pavel,
If you are interested, you can take the revi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2010-06-07 05:35:41 EDT ---
Mohammed Imran, do you plan make this review
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge 2010-06-07
05:22:19 EDT ---
Update:
SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/logcheck-1.3.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Runge 2010-05-10
03:22:54 EDT ---
Version 1.3.8-3 contains a modified list of logfiles to watch, s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge 2010-05-08
16:12:53 EDT ---
Thank you for your review.
I did not perform the install routin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
Mohammed Imran changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge 2010-05-07
03:17:26 EDT ---
[mru...@mrungexp SPECS]$ rpmlint logcheck.spec
../RPMS/noarch/lo
47 matches
Mail list logo
