Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-18 09:56:24 EST
---
This ticket is somewhat confusing. First,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-11-18 10:09:21 EST ---
This is a different piece of code than the lzma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #32 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-18 10:16:25 EST
---
So this is intended to replace the existing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #33 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-11-18 10:24:52 EST ---
Not at all. It's intended to exist solely to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-18 10:31:33 EST
---
And therein lies my confusion. We already
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #29 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-09-04 23:14:11 EDT
---
Firefox 4.0 also includes a copy of lzma sdk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-08-20 08:59:47 EDT ---
I think what I've done here, and how I use if with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #27 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2010-08-20
10:47:10 EDT ---
No objection to merging the packages.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #24 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2010-08-16
17:37:11 EDT ---
From a security and other bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #25 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-08-16 22:13:35 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #24)
From a security and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #23 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-08-14 22:54:44 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #22)
I think I'd rename
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-08-12 16:14:38 EDT ---
Only Frinika uses it, also orphaned. I could take
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-08-12 16:04:45 EDT ---
Interesting thing. Just saw put 2 and 2 together,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-06-29 09:42:14 EDT ---
If you want an exception for UPX, go to FESCO. If
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #15 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-05 09:47:57 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #14)
upx.
WRT 9.x, I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #16 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2010-06-05 10:27:16 EDT
---
I think claiming bundling it isn't a bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #18 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2010-06-05 10:55:50 EDT
---
Shouldn't the packaging committee discuss this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #13 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-03 06:13:59 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #10)
Possible, but since
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-06-03 09:30:38 EDT ---
What's complicated about it? Are there specific
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-06-02 08:06:55 EDT ---
So I just need this for upx then.
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #9 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-06-02 08:14:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
So I just need this for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-06-02 13:49:11 EDT ---
Possible, but since I don't know how to make that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #11 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2010-06-02 14:30:11 EDT
---
I took a quick look at the spec file and have a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-06-02 14:47:54 EDT ---
A. Sure. I can make a modified tarball.
B. Why
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-06-01 11:13:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I don't known if it's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #7 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2010-06-01 11:38:38 EDT ---
At one time the development version of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #2 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-05-27 04:47:10 EDT ---
gentoo seems to be allowing bundled lzma-sdk, as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #3 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2010-05-27 08:28:12 EDT ---
I think it is better to package it once and have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #4 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-05-27 22:55:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I think it is better to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #5 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2010-05-28 00:30:28 EDT ---
Once the devel version of squashfs started
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
34 matches
Mail list logo
