[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2015-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2015-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2015-01-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #24 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-IPC-Signal New Branches: EPEL7 Owners: mrunge -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2015-01-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- You

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-10-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-14 14:24:04 EDT --- perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-2.el5 has

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-10-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-09-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-28 02:35:40 EDT --- perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-2.el5 has

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-09-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-09-25 00:51:49 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-09-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-07-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-07-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-07-04 21:43:52 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). --

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-29 11:32:45 EDT --- perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-1.fc13 has

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-14 04:17:06 EDT --- perl-IPC-Signal-1.00-1.fc13 has

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2010-06-14 00:46:34 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). We aren't

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #13 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de 2010-06-11 02:55:44 EDT --- Paul, thanks for your review and

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de 2010-06-10 05:14:15 EDT --- [mru...@mrungexp SPECS]$ rpmlint

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de 2010-06-10 06:25:32 EDT --- Thank you for your quick comments.

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-06-10 06:35:04 EDT --- You changed the URL tag (which was OK) instead of

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de 2010-06-10 06:50:51 EDT --- fixed. Updated versions are under Spec

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2010-06-10 13:44:13 EDT --- Typical - no sooner do I hit the button and I

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 602587] Review Request: perl-IPC-Signal - Utility functions dealing with signals

2010-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602587 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de 2010-06-10 15:06:00 EDT --- Understood and thank you Iain, for