[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2014-01-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2014-01-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2014-01-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-06 13:10:04 EDT --- sparsehash-1.7-3.fc13 has been

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-07-03 06:34:32 EDT --- sparsehash-1.7-3.fc13 has been

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2010-07-02 17:36:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Two suggestions: 1.

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2010-07-02 17:41:07 EDT --- * Sat Jul 03 2010 Kalev Lember

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 Adam Miller maxamill...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 --- Comment #7 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-07-02 21:39:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 --- Comment #8 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-07-02 21:49:36 EDT --- s/conversion/convention -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-07-02 23:28:23 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py). --

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-07-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 Andrew Himelstieb drewhimelst...@d2e.us changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 609728] Review Request: sparsehash - Extremely memory-efficient C++ hash_map implementation

2010-06-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609728 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed: What|Removed |Added