https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Bug 613001 depends on bug 692606, which changed state.
Bug 692606 Summary: Use alternatives to allow for heimdal packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692606
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #72 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #70 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Shouldn't it be packaged as heimdal?
Upstream tarball name:
http://www.h5l.org/dist/src/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Heimdal - |Review Request: heimdal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #66 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
Upstream fixed a large bug in the krb5-config utility so I'm updating the Git
snapshot again to the tip of 1.6.
I've taken your advice and installed login.users(5) into the regular
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #67 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
We're going to need xinetd still on =EL6, so I'm fine with either keeping it
for now and then migrating to systemd sockets after import, or adding the
systemd socket stuff now with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #65 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
Also, the xinetd stuff should be replaced with systemd configs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #64 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
# systemctl start heimdal-kadmind
Job for heimdal-kadmind.service failed. See 'systemctl status
heimdal-kadmind.service' and 'journalctl -xn' for details.
May 28 12:25:30 barry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #62 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
Here's the new version. This should address the issues in comment #58 (along
with other fixes).
* Thu May 22 2014 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com -
1.6.0-0.4.20140522git229d8c7
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #60 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #59)
We kept %defattr() because we were going to support EL5. I'm on the fence
about supporting EL5 now, but let's keep it in for now.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #61 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
%defattr() isn't needed even in EL5.
More precisely: not for Fedora koji based EL5 builds and not for recent EL5
dist releases either, but only for older 5.x releases.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #59 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
Thanks very much for the review. I'm working on addressing the issues you
mentioned.
We kept %defattr() because we were going to support EL5. I'm on the fence about
supporting EL5 now,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|or...@cora.nwra.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #55 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
The libtommath bundling exception passed the FPC, so there are no more blockers
to accepting this into Fedora.
I've updated the package to the latest 1.6 git snapshot.
Package in Git:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #56 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
So, I did a local build of this on my F20 box and it failed running the tests.
I notice that configure picked up a few extra things on my local build:
+checking lex library... -lfl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #57 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #56)
So, I did a local build of this on my F20 box and it failed running the
tests. I notice that configure picked up a few extra things on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #52 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
(In reply to Paul Robert Marino from comment #51)
Can we consolidate this effort on Github or some similar site for spec
files, patches, etc..
Sure. Our latest spec file and package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #54 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
Hi Christopher, Alexander's latest pull request on GitHub
(https://github.com/libtom/libtommath/pull/18) is out of date with what's now
bundled in Heimdal's 1.6 branch. So that pull
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #36 from Rok Papez rok.pa...@lugos.si 2011-10-04 12:15:53 EDT ---
Heimdal 1.5.1 is released, rpms are here:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #37 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-10-04 19:58:39 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #36)
I'm not sure I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #32 from Rok Papez rok.pa...@lugos.si 2011-09-28 02:09:53 EDT ---
AFAIK systemd:
- has compatibility mode for legacy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #33 from Rok Papez rok.pa...@lugos.si 2011-09-28 04:31:25 EDT ---
I'm releasing new packages for Fedora 15 x86_64:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #34 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-09-28 11:37:54
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #32)
AFAIK systemd:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #35 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-09-28 17:10:00 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #33)
I'm releasing new
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #30 from Rok Papez rok.pa...@lugos.si 2011-09-27 13:32:06 EDT ---
I'm currently building with a version from GIT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #31 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-09-27 13:41:56
EDT ---
Note also that a number of changes will
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #29 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-09-20 11:41:09 EDT
---
Just a note that 1.5 is now released.
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) rdas...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #28 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-04-07 16:00:25
EDT ---
* Thu Apr 7 2011 Orion Poplawksi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #27 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-03-31 13:18:48
EDT ---
Submitted bug 692606 to ask for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #25 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-03-30 11:25:01
EDT ---
* Wed Mar 30 2011 Orion Poplawksi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #26 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-31 00:13:51 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #23)
- Heimdal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #23 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-03-29 18:31:31
EDT ---
I've put a (heavily) modified version of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #24 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-30 01:25:53 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #23)
I've put a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #17 from Andy Cobaugh phale...@gmail.com 2011-03-28 12:19:05 EDT
---
Some of the commands are similar, some aren't.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #18 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-28 13:01:55 EDT
---
Yeah, the commands are certainly different.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #19 from Andy Cobaugh phale...@gmail.com 2011-03-28 13:19:32 EDT
---
Fair enough. You use alternatives to switch to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #20 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-03-28 17:21:05
EDT ---
Created attachment 488277
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #21 from Rok Papez rok.pa...@lugos.si 2011-03-28 18:12:33 EDT ---
In my opinion the /usr/heimdal is the most
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #22 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-28 19:04:22 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #20)
Created attachment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #15 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com 2011-03-26 15:15:16 EDT
---
I would love to get Heimdal into Fedora.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-01-31 12:55:24
EST ---
Looks like imath has been dropped in git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #7 from Rok Papez rok.pa...@lugos.si 2011-01-21 03:03:28 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
What's the status here?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-01-21 13:36:39
EST ---
Looks like there are a couple bundled
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #9 from Rok Papez rok.pa...@lugos.si 2011-01-21 14:41:48 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Looks like there are a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #10 from Andy Cobaugh phale...@gmail.com 2011-01-21 15:57:09 EST
---
I would also prefer that they stay separate.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #11 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-01-21 16:07:19
EST ---
/usr/heimdal is just not going to be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-01-21 16:09:42
EST ---
Created attachment 474690
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-01-21 17:36:43
EST ---
To actually use the system sqlite library,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org 2010-11-30 04:47:37
EST ---
I'm keen for Heimdal to make it in to Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-29 19:25:38 EST
---
I note that Rok never responded to Andy's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
--- Comment #1 from Andy Cobaugh phale...@gmail.com 2010-09-16 16:27:49 EDT
---
I've been meaning to comment on this bug for a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001
Rok Papez rok.pa...@lugos.si changed:
What|Removed |Added
62 matches
Mail list logo
