[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-10-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 --- Comment #6 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-07-13 11:41:29 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2010-07-12 12:16:03 EDT --- That file is a binary RPM, not the SRPM.

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

2010-07-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2010-07-12 12:22:10 EDT --- + rpmlint output + package name satisfies