Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-09-19 15:23:49 EDT ---
Please use a "Package Change Request" for a change to an existing p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
Chen Lei changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
Chen Lei changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-09-10 14:48:18 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #17 from Chen Lei 2010-09-10 12:36:28 EDT
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: EmfEngi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
Chen Lei changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #14 from Chen Lei 2010-09-07 06:19:07 EDT
---
No guideline forbid to use %{isa} macro, if the packaging draft is ap
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2010-09-07 03:54:44 EDT ---
Many current packages have also errors (see
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #12 from Chen Lei 2010-09-06 10:50:35 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #11).
> Blocker is usage of %{?_isa}.
%{?_isa}
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2010-09-06 10:05:53 EDT ---
You are right it is not.
Blocker is usage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #10 from Chen Lei 2010-09-03 21:24:42 EDT
---
Is there any blocker for approving this package? Currently, there are
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #9 from Chen Lei 2010-08-27 10:05:03 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > %{?_isa} is only useful for broken repo, u
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2010-08-27 09:55:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I had send question
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #7 from Chen Lei 2010-08-27 09:19:21 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2010-08-27 08:59:18 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2010-08-27 08:32:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > We should not a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2010-08-27 08:17:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #3 from Chen Lei 2010-08-27 07:50:45 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> [-] MUST: The package must be named accordin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
--- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2010-08-27 07:26:00 EDT ---
Legend:
+ - Ok.
- - Error.
+/- - It item acc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618480
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed:
What|Removed |Added
21 matches
Mail list logo
