Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-11 23:43:06 EST ---
whois-5.0.11-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-07 06:55:47 EST ---
whois-5.0.11-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-05 12:01:53 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #13 from Petr Pisar 2011-03-03 04:09:48 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: whois
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
Felix Kaechele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar 2010-12-06 07:08:36 EST ---
Latest 5.0.10 version:
Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/who
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #9 from Felix Kaechele 2010-12-04 06:27:15 EST
---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Proble
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
Felix Kaechele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar 2010-11-10 12:35:16 EST ---
jwhois packager accepted my patch for package alternation in Fedora 1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
Felix Kaechele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham 2010-10-04 12:07:48
EDT ---
I'm saying if this new one is clearly better, we should just sw
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2010-10-04 11:52:15 EDT ---
Yeah, one foo suits to all of them. Where did I heard it :)
Have you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham 2010-10-04 11:24:56
EDT ---
Then either fix jwhois, or ship whois. Forcing people to compar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2010-09-30 03:24:37 EDT ---
At first jwhois has been unusable in Red Hat corporate network becaus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638666
--- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2010-09-29 12:50:43
EDT ---
... is there really a reason to have multiple alternatives here
20 matches
Mail list logo
