Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #13 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-03-28 09:27:55 EDT
---
Ok, I gave this another pass, and upadted the package to the lat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #14 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-03-28 20:19:40 EDT
---
Today upstream released a new version, 0.1.2, so I updated the p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #15 from Bill Nottingham 2011-03-28 22:04:15
EDT ---
So, looking at the updated version (review appears to have sta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Lucas Rocha changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Bill Nottingham changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Bill Nottingham changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Cosimo Cecchi changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-03-30 20:52:38 EDT
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #2 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-01-18 09:06:46 EST
---
Thanks for the review Fabian.
I addressed your comments and supp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Matthias Clasen changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #4 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-01-21 08:38:03 EST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> You don't need to rm -rf %{buildroot}
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Matthias Clasen changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2011-01-21 10:35:05
EST ---
Builds fine in mock after adding libmx-1.1 to a local repo
rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #6 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-01-28 12:10:23 EST
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> the errors should be addressed, the w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2011-01-28 13:29:08
EST ---
I still get
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/resu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Colin Walters changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #9 from Cosimo Cecchi 2011-01-28 15:48:20 EST
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> One complicating issue is if the-board
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen 2011-01-31 20:35:15
EST ---
ok, going down the checklist now:
rpmlint: see above, ok
pack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Christoph Wickert changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670127
Christoph Wickert changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
24 matches
Mail list logo
