[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 --- Comment #9 from Matthew Garrett 2011-04-25 09:13:57 EDT --- Sorry, I got distracted with pushing the kernel side of this up

[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-04-25 04:57:51 EDT --- Matthew? What's going on with this review? This package was app

[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Garrett 2011-01-19 10:26:53 EST --- Ok, fixed both of those. Spec URL: http://www.codon.org.uk/~mj

[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-01-19 00:11:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > > Still no legal information in libb

[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Garrett 2011-01-18 23:04:11 EST --- > libbacklight.c:81:2: warning: implicit declaration of functio

[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2011-01-18 22:03:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) > unistd.h added (not sure why I'm not

[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Garrett 2011-01-18 09:54:29 EST --- Updates: C++ extern guards added unistd.h added (not sure why

[Bug 670302] Review Request: libbacklight - Linux backlight abstraction library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670302 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added