Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
Jeffrey Ness changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
Jeffrey Ness changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #17 from Dennis Gilmore 2011-04-28 12:26:22 EDT
---
this already exists in fedora
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-04-27
13:32:18 EDT ---
Incorrect SCM Request above
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-04-27
13:36:20 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: pyt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
Jeffrey Ness changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-04-27
13:46:16 EDT ---
Lets add el6 as well
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.red
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-04-27
13:30:30 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: pyt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-04-27
13:46:30 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: pyt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
BJ Dierkes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
BJ Dierkes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-04-27
10:53:02 EDT ---
Message to the Elixir Group regrading missing Test and LICENSE:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-04-19
16:56:44 EDT ---
Hey BJ,
As our test show, elixer is not Python 3 compatible yet (
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #8 from BJ Dierkes 2011-04-19 15:27:25 EDT
---
Everything looks good. Just a few comments:
Notify upstream that t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
BJ Dierkes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
Bug 672951 depends on bug 678690, which changed state.
Bug 678690 Summary: Provide support for multi-python byte compiling
https
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
BJ Dierkes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-02-21
09:43:52 EST ---
Hello Dave,
Thanks a lot for sharing this patch!
I verified with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
Dave Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #4 from BJ Dierkes 2011-01-31 19:14:03 EST
---
Looks good. Unfortunately (as I thought might be the case) the pyth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Ness 2011-01-31
19:08:58 EST ---
Wanted to get this package built for Fedora base Python, RHEL base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672951
Jeffrey Ness changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
22 matches
Mail list logo
