[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2017-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2015-05-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2015-05-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #45 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2015-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #44 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru --- Package Change Request === Package Name: qconf Owners: ivanromanov New Branches: epel7 InitialCC: ivanromanov -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2015-04-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- You are

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2012-01-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2012-01-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-01-03 05:11:13 EST --- qconf-1.4-4.el6 has been

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-12-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-12-31 21:45:54 EST --- qconf-1.4-3.el6 has been

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-10-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-10-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #40 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-06 16:09:25 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-10-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #39 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-10-03 11:18:35 EDT --- Package Change Request ===

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-05-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-05-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-27 16:28:58 EDT --- qconf-1.4-2.fc14 has been

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-05-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #36 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-24 10:44:31 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). --

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-05-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-05-24 13:34:45 EDT --- qconf-1.4-2.fc14 has been

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-05-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-05-23 13:40:40 EDT --- You cannot submit a new package request for a

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-05-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-05-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-24 22:42:04 EDT --- qconf-1.4-2.fc15 has been

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-04-20 21:15:09 EDT --- qconf-1.4-2.fc15 has been

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-19 14:11:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). --

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #26 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-04-18 04:07:16 EDT --- Source package with both patches.

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #28 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-04-18 13:11:28 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ===

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #22 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-04-09 04:32:26 EDT --- How you found this conflict? -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #23 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2011-04-09 09:00:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) I would use

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #24 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-04-09 09:23:39 EDT --- It's fine! ?? - patches should have an upstream bug

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #25 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-04-09 13:16:37 EDT --- I made patch to rename. Have a look at

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #21 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-04-09 00:25:36 EDT --- ERR- conflicts: - the package gridengine also

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #14 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2011-03-31 03:44:57 EDT --- Oh, I see. It is unfortunate that CXXFLAGS

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #15 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-03-31 10:17:01 EDT --- Ok. I have added such patch. Have a look at

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #16 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2011-03-31 14:01:20 EDT --- Well, I don't think you need to copy

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #17 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2011-03-31 14:09:54 EDT --- here's a scratch build:

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #18 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-03-31 14:45:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) here's a scratch build:

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #19 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-03-31 15:37:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) Well, I don't think you

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #8 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2011-03-30 11:09:48 EDT --- Looks quite good to me. I am still worried

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #10 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-03-30 15:49:28 EDT --- Also you can see into psi.spec. It don't use

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #11 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2011-03-30 16:16:22 EDT --- I had a look at the generated Makefile

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #12 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2011-03-30 16:20:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Anyway if i use

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #13 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-03-30 21:29:44 EDT --- I don't shure that it proper to give %{opflags} for

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #7 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-03-29 15:29:15 EDT --- I mistake. Have a look at new variant of .spec file

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #4 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-03-18 13:05:20 EDT --- Hello Michal. Thank you for review. I corrected

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #5 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2011-03-18 15:25:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) I must use

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-02-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru 2011-02-10 08:24:19 EST --- Done

[Bug 676129] Review Request: qconf - Allows you to have a nice configure script for your qmake-based project

2011-02-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added