Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for Python based on 
Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679613

           Summary: Review Request: python-flask - A microframework for
                    Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: dyo...@mesd.k12.or.us
         QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
                CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/python-flask/python-flask.spec
SRPM URL:
http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/python-flask/python-flask-0.6.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: 
A microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions

Flask is called a “microframework” because the idea to keep the core
simple but extensible. There is no database abstraction layer, no form
validation or anything else where different libraries already exist
that can handle that. However Flask knows the concept of extensions
that can add this functionality into your application as if it was
implemented in Flask itself. There are currently extensions for object
relational mappers, form validation, upload handling, various open
authentication technologies and more.

Upstream is here: http://flask.pocoo.org/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to