Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
--- Comment #12 from Miroslav Suchý 2011-10-17 09:00:57 EDT
---
It means that no one is reviewing it. I want to review it, but
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
--- Comment #9 from Justin Morgan 2011-04-12
19:50:11 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Justin, you should be using upstream's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
--- Comment #8 from Chris Tyler 2011-04-11 09:38:01 EDT ---
Justin, you should be using upstream's tarballs directly (pristine s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
--- Comment #7 from Justin Morgan 2011-04-10
22:47:27 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Release 0.2-2
>
> SPEC: http://matrix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
--- Comment #6 from Justin Morgan 2011-04-10
22:46:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> [?] MUST: The License field in the pac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
--- Comment #5 from Chris Tyler 2011-04-09 15:46:45 EDT ---
Release 3 spec doesn't work with the release 2 sources and no SRPM w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
--- Comment #4 from Justin Morgan 2011-04-03
18:59:33 EDT ---
Updated spec file to release 3:
http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
--- Comment #3 from Justin Morgan 2011-03-28
23:05:24 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Are the BuildRequires really needed? P
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690360
--- Comment #1 from Justin Morgan 2011-03-24
00:18:46 EDT ---
Apologies. Incorrect SRPM URL link. Here's the correct one:
http
15 matches
Mail list logo
