Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #21 from Jitesh Shah 2011-07-14 21:24:32
EDT ---
Rahul, pjp:
If you want the ownership of the rawhide branch too, I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2011-07-14 19:38:18 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla 2011-07-12 23:16:56 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #15 from Jitesh Shah 2011-07-09 05:03:12
EDT ---
Rahul,
already did that more than a week ago.
http://koji.fedorapr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #14 from Rahul Sundaram 2011-07-09 04:44:35
EDT ---
Are you going to build this package?
--
Configure bugmail: ht
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2011-06-29 11:48:08 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
Jitesh Shah changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
pjp changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #10 from pjp 2011-06-29 06:42:31 EDT ---
[X] Package name - ok.
[X] Package group - ok.
[X] Build successful - ok.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram 2011-06-29 06:17:34 EDT
---
Regardless of md5sum issues, if you are generating a tarball,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #8 from Jitesh Shah 2011-06-29 02:20:15 EDT
---
Ok. Package group added. Using gzip shouldn't be a problem either.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram 2011-06-28 16:32:33 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Is the package group needed? Its not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #6 from pjp 2011-06-28 08:55:34 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Is the package group needed? Its not an applicati
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #5 from Jitesh Shah 2011-06-28 02:48:33 EDT
---
Is the package group needed? Its not an application that can be lau
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #4 from Jitesh Shah 2011-06-28 02:42:51 EDT
---
Relevant revision control information included:
The new SPEC file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
pjp changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
pjp changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716844
--- Comment #1 from Jitesh Shah 2011-06-27 05:16:23 EDT
---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3163190
--
Con
23 matches
Mail list logo
