[Bug 725844] Review Request: python-dateutil15 - Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module

2011-07-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725844 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 725844] Review Request: python-dateutil15 - Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module

2011-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725844 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2011-07-26 15:19:05 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://b

[Bug 725844] Review Request: python-dateutil15 - Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module

2011-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725844 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 725844] Review Request: python-dateutil15 - Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module

2011-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725844 pjp changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 725844] Review Request: python-dateutil15 - Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module

2011-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725844 --- Comment #2 from pjp 2011-07-26 14:35:44 EDT --- [X] $ rpmlint SRPMS/python-dateutil15-1.5-1.fc14.src.rpm python-dateutil15.

[Bug 725844] Review Request: python-dateutil15 - Powerful extensions to the standard datetime module

2011-07-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725844 pjp changed: What|Removed |Added ---