https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #61 from Fedora Update System ---
salt-0.9.9.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #56 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2012-05-02 10:19:31 EDT
---
Clint, it is not necessary to continue add this bug to the li
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System
2012-04-30 19:43:12 EDT ---
salt-0.9.9.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System
2012-04-30 19:40:51 EDT ---
salt-0.9.9.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System
2012-04-30 19:42:00 EDT ---
salt-0.9.9.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System
2012-04-30 19:38:55 EDT ---
salt-0.9.9.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System
2012-04-30 19:40:08 EDT ---
salt-0.9.9.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-22 00:07:21 EDT ---
salt-0.9.8-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-22 00:05:34 EDT ---
salt-0.9.8-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-22 00:04:10 EDT ---
salt-0.9.8-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-22 00:06:25 EDT ---
salt-0.9.8-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-21 23:55:03 EDT ---
salt-0.9.8-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-13 14:02:53 EDT ---
salt-0.9.7-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-13 14:02:05 EDT ---
salt-0.9.7-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-13 14:01:18 EDT ---
salt-0.9.7-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-08 16:39:28 EST ---
salt-0.9.7-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-08 16:40:31 EST ---
salt-0.9.7-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System
2012-02-22 02:48:23 EST ---
salt-0.9.6-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System
2012-02-13 12:20:52 EST ---
salt-0.9.6-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System
2012-02-13 12:19:25 EST ---
salt-0.9.6-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System
2012-02-13 12:16:12 EST ---
salt-0.9.6-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System
2012-01-17 15:08:02 EST ---
salt-0.9.4-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2012-01-17 15:07:21 EST ---
salt-0.9.4-7.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System
2012-01-17 15:05:45 EST ---
salt-0.9.4-7.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2012-01-15 17:22:25 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Clint Savage changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #18 from Clint Savage 2012-01-11 11:21:08 EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: salt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #16 from Clint Savage 2012-01-08 22:26:43 EST ---
I believe I've cleaned up all of the rpmlint. I really should have
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Spura 2012-01-08
19:23:45 EST ---
- %if ! (0%{?rhel} < 7 || 0%{?fedora} < 15) doesn't "work" on f16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #14 from Clint Savage 2012-01-08 16:04:12 EST ---
Updated everything.
SPEC: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/sal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #13 from Clint Savage 2012-01-08 15:10:41 EST ---
Okay, I think I've cleaned up those things.
- You added the syste
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Spura 2012-01-08
13:58:00 EST ---
- You added the systemctrl reloads for non-systemd releases. '%if
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #11 from Clint Savage 2012-01-08 00:22:31 EST ---
I think ti have accommodated all of those requests. Let me know if
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #9 from Clint Savage 2012-01-07 13:54:24 EST ---
Okay, systemd support for Fedora15+ has been added to the rpm now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #8 from Clint Savage 2012-01-03 17:39:03 EST ---
Hi Jeffrey,
Yes, we are using epel to solve the issue with python2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2012-01-03 17:25:43 EST
---
I'm trying to get salt to work on CentOS 5 - my current stumbl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #6 from Clint Savage 2011-12-01 12:37:04 EST ---
Well, that didn't last too long. The requirement for Cython went aw
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #5 from Clint Savage 2011-12-01 11:24:37 EST ---
Updated SRPM and spec file below.
SRPM: http://herlo.fedorapeople.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #4 from Clint Savage 2011-11-17 17:04:17 EST ---
Updated SRPM and spec file below.
SRPM: http://herlo.fedorapeople.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #3 from Clint Savage 2011-11-14 23:44:52 EST ---
Indeed there is news. I am working on packaging up 0.9.3 this week.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2011-11-14
17:38:45 EST ---
Ping, any news here?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737286
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2011-09-22
11:10:22 EDT ---
Just a few comments for now:
- Where does the source come from? Th
62 matches
Mail list logo
