[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #19 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-12-19 03:40:34 EST --- Can you please build package for F15,16 and

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #16 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-12-16 08:36:48 EST --- == Key: - = N/A x = Check ! =

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2011-12-16 12:04:56 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests). --

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #12 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-12-15 11:37:40 EST --- It builds successfully:

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #13 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2011-12-15 11:47:12 EST --- I can diff them, but notice that the latest tag in

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #14 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2011-12-15 11:49:16 EST --- They are not the same: $ diff -urN quartz-2.1.1

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #15 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-12-15 11:53:25 EST --- Aha, ok then. I will finish this review

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-12-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #9 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2011-12-02 20:35:30 EST --- I have confirmed now that switching to quartz-2.1.1

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-11-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #8 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2011-11-29 21:22:11 EST --- Sorry, this has not been very high on my priority

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-11-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-11-22 15:01:02 EST --- ping? any progress here? -- Configure

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-10-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-10-05 03:44:44 EDT --- Re epoch - true that 0 != ''. If it was

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-10-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #6 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2011-10-05 08:51:11 EDT --- I've grep'ed through our code, and it appears that

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-10-04 04:47:53 EDT --- It build successfully in koji in Fedora 17:

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-10-04 04:52:45 EDT --- rpmlint output: quartz.noarch: W:

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com 2011-10-04 05:02:47 EDT --- I really does not understood why you define

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-10-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 --- Comment #4 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2011-10-04 17:49:53 EDT --- The oname macro and epoch of 0 were left over from

[Bug 738079] Review Request: quartz - Enterprise Job Scheduler for Java

2011-10-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738079 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added