[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|openblas-0.2.5-10.el6 |openblas-0.2.11-1.el7 --- Comme

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.11-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openblas-0.2.11-1.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC lis

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #50 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component __

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #49 from Susi L

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|505154 (FE-SCITECH) | Referenced Bugs: h

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #48 from Susi Lehtola --- No, I hadn't thought about it at all... I believe we can't make the 64-bit interface the default, because this needs to be taken care of in the user side as well. Anyway, patches are welcome. Also, this

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Milan Bouchet-Valat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nalimi...@club.fr --- Comment #4

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|openblas-0.2.5-10.fc19 |openblas-0.2.5-10.el5 --- Comment

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|openblas-0.2.5-10.el5 |openblas-0.2.5-10.el6 --- Comment

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|openblas-0.2.5-10.fc18 |openblas-0.2.5-10.fc19 --- Commen

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #42 from Susi Lehtola --- FYI, this was hanging around since I was waiting for upstream to fix a rather nasty bug [1], and only recently received information that the bug is in the OpenBLAS LAPACK functions. I've now replaced the opti

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.5-10.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openblas-0.2.5-10.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.5-10.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openblas-0.2.5-10.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list fo

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.5-10.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openblas-0.2.5-10.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.5-10.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openblas-0.2.5-10.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list fo

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.5-7.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug h

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.5-7.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openblas-0.2.5-7.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.5-7.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openblas-0.2.5-7.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are o

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.5-7.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openblas-0.2.5-7.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.5-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openblas-0.2.5-7.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are o

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #32 from Susi Lehtola --- For reference, I'm not building any non-x86(_64) binaries since upstream only supports x86 and Loongson; they don't have access to ia64, ppc, sparc and power architecture machines. -- You ar

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uPSXKcJ7vr&a=

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #28 from Susi Lehtola --- (In reply to comment #23) > Actually, I think it's wrong to resolve the file conflicts by changing the > library SONAMEs. All versions, irrespective of the thread options, implement > the same

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #27 from Susi Lehtola --- So, the reasoning boils down to a very simple fact: whether a program will be SMP is determined at compile time. Thus the choice of the flavor of library to use should also be done at compile

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #26 from Susi Lehtola --- Coming from a high-performance computing background, I just listed the reasons above in comment #24. Even the environment modules solution is really a pain in the ass, since what the environm

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #25 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Go with environment modules, then. By using different SONAMEs, you're forcing users to relink if they want to switch from serial to parallel. Why do you think compile-time ch

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #24 from Susi Lehtola --- Then ATLAS does it wrong. Putting the choice on system level is giving you the choice between a hammer and a sledgehammer, when you might want to use a hammer for some things and the sledgeha

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #23 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Created attachment 677085 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=677085&action=edit parallel installable libopenblas versions with same SONAME Actually, I think

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #22 from Susi Lehtola --- (In reply to comment #21) > Would it be possible to produce a 64bit integer variant say openblas64 by > adding INTERFACE64=1? Yes, it would. But I figure the 4-byte integer variant is still

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Robert Szalai changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.sza...@bris.ac.uk ---

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #20 from Susi Lehtola --- Turns out the problem was that in the OpenMP version you still need USE_THREADS=1. Fixed in the above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #19 from Susi Lehtola --- I've fixed everything else except the unused-direct-shlib-dependency stuff. I'll contact upstream about it. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas.spec http://theory.physi

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #18 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Thanks, it builds on EPEL-6 fine now. rpmlint output for rawhide build: openblas-threads.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pthreads -> threads, p threads, threader op

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #17 from Susi Lehtola --- Well, I remembered that lapacke support can be turned off. Here's a version that builds also in EPEL. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas.spec http://theory.physics.hels

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #16 from Susi Lehtola --- Looks like lapacke was integrated in lapack only in version 3.4.0, and it is thus unavailable in EPEL, which only has 3.2.1 (EL6) vs 3.0 (EL5). Now this does raise once again the question of

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #15 from Susi Lehtola --- Nope, no typo - liblapacke contains the C interfaces. $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/liblapacke.a lapack-static-3.4.1-2.fc18.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Build fails on EL-6/x86_64 at %prep stage: Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /home/rathann/build/tmp/rpm-tmp.MbqSqa ... + mkdir netliblapack + cd netliblapack + ar x /usr/lib64/l

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #13 from Susi Lehtola --- ... but don't include the reference implementations of functions that have an optimized implementation in openblas. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas.spec http://theo

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #12 from Susi Lehtola --- Use system version of LAPACK. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas-0.2.5-3.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiv

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #11 from Susi Lehtola --- Dominik - could you approve the review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CGS52QS

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #10 from Susi Lehtola --- Oh, I fixed the build issue on i386 and RHEL5 as well. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas-0.2.5-2.fc18.sr

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola --- (In reply to comment #8) > I'll be taking a two-week vacation now, so I won't be able to look at this > until I get back. Whoops... Anyway, I have rebased the package to 0.2.5, otherwise the

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Alex Lancaster changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-10-13 15:51:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > > Minimum requirements for Fedora ar

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2011-10-13 15:11:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-10-05 18:38:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The gcc command which the library is l

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2011-10-05 17:29:01 EDT --- Builds in mock rawhide/x86_64. $ rpmlint /var/l

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-09-21 07:23:44 EDT --- FYI: I've already asked upstream to soname the libraries properly

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-09-18 18:13:13 EDT --- I ran a series of matrix diagonalization benchmarks, and on my In

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2011-09-18 12:37:23 EDT --- There is one slight problem with the package: -devel picks up a d