https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #21 from Richard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #20 from Orion Poplawski ---
I think just removing the version requirement is the way to go. Thanks!
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: abi-compliance-checker
New Branches: el6
Owners: orion
InitialCC:
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #19 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I'd like to see this in EPEL 6. Richard, do you have any interest in
> maintaining there, or shall I?
You're more than welcome to. I thought it would probably be nice to have but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #18 from Orion Poplawski ---
Hmm, is the gcc >= 4.5 a hard requirement?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #17 fr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2011-11-17 13:38:57 EST ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.95.10-1.fc15 has been submitted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System
2011-11-17 13:38:50 EST ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.95.10-1.fc16 has been submitted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2011-11-17 09:42:11 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #10 from Richard Shaw 2011-11-17 09:31:33
EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: abi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #9 from Iain Arnell 2011-11-17 09:28:38 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
>
> Does this make it "GPL+ or LGPLv2+"?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #8 from Richard Shaw 2011-11-17 09:02:47 EST
---
I got an answer:
From: Andrey Ponomarenko
Hello,
This is great
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) 2011-11-17 02:29:30 EST
---
Looking into
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#What_i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw 2011-11-16 10:44:13 EST
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The best solution is to ask upstream to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2011-11-16 09:45:32 EST ---
Looking again, both LICENSE.txt and doc/Readme.html state "GPL or LG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #4 from Richard Shaw 2011-11-16 09:29:47 EST
---
I have updated everything but need clarification. Iain says it's "
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) 2011-11-16 03:30:32 EST
---
Thanks for your comment Iain. yes license should be "GPLv2+ or L
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
Iain Arnell changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753900
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
24 matches
Mail list logo
