Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
csmith-2.1.0-6.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
csmith-2.1.0-6.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
csmith-2.1.0-6.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
csmith-2.1.0-6.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
csmith-2.1.0-6.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csmith-2.1.0-6.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
csmith-2.1.0-6.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csmith-2.1.0-6.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
csmith-2.1.0-6.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csmith-2.1.0-6.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
pack
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|RELEASE_PENDING
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #20 from Jerry James ---
Hmmm, that results in the main csmith package creating both
/usr/share/doc/csmith and /usr/share/doc/csmith-2.1.0. Can you get all of the
documentation files into one or the other?
Also, the BuildRoot tag in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #19 from Shakthi Kannan ---
Thanks for the review. The --disable-static doesn't have any effect, and hence
have used the find syntax. I have made the other necessary changes.
SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/csmith.spe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #17 from Shakthi Kannan ---
Sorry for the delayed response. I have created a patch to remove the custom
header files, so users can use the system header files.
SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/csmith.spec
SRPM: shakth
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-19 08:47:41 EDT
---
It will either need to wait until the problem is fixed or use syste
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #13 from Shakthi Kannan 2012-01-04 23:36:51
EST ---
I have made a FPC request for this package to include the heade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2012-01-04 07:58:35 EST
---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
Can
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #11 from Shakthi Kannan 2012-01-03 23:22:03
EST ---
Upstream's reply on the headers:
"For the sake of everyone's s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-06 08:16:24 EST
---
That's fine for them, as long as the licensing allows them to redis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #9 from Shakthi Kannan 2011-12-06 07:18:43
EST ---
I checked with upstream on using the header files. Their reply w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #8 from Shakthi Kannan 2011-12-01 07:13:14
EST ---
I checked with upstream regarding test_csmith.pl and it is not r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2011-11-28 09:22:32 EST ---
Bundled headers are as much a problem as bundled solibs.
--
Configu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes 2011-11-28 04:41:40 EST ---
Obviously there aren't any bundled libraries as such, but there are s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan 2011-11-26 03:04:35
EST ---
Thanks for your review and comments.
* Added patch to build for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes 2011-11-23 06:21:33 EST ---
Oh, and some of the header files are GPL so license tag needs to refl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756321
--- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2011-11-23 04:30:50
EST ---
$ rpmlint SPECS/csmith.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked;
34 matches
Mail list logo