Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
Honza Horak changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2012-01-06 09:23:57 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
Honza Horak changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
--- Comment #8 from Honza Horak 2012-01-06 03:21:38 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> - the source archive is not compressed al
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
--- Comment #7 from Honza Horak 2011-12-15 12:51:36 EST ---
I've asked upstream to specify the license version and correct FSF a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
--- Comment #6 from Tom Lane 2011-12-15 10:24:16 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Review comments seem mostly sound, except thi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
--- Comment #5 from Dan Horák 2011-12-15 08:49:37 EST ---
formal review is here, see the notes explaining OK* and BAD statuses b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
--- Comment #4 from Honza Horak 2011-12-15 07:12:25 EST ---
I've accidentally attached a link to a binary package, so these are
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
--- Comment #2 from Honza Horak 2011-12-14 11:00:05 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> One note is that when unixODBC is bumped
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767622
--- Comment #1 from Tom Lane 2011-12-14 09:52:08 EST ---
One note is that when unixODBC is bumped to 2.3.x, it will no longer co
12 matches
Mail list logo
