https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #39 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Jorge A Gallegos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #38 from Jo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #37 from Jorge A Gallegos ---
Mitch,
As you can see in the bug details, this got completed a while back and uWSGI is
available in Fedora 17. I just pushed v1.2.4 and has been sitting in
updates-testing for a couple of days (see
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #36 from Mitch Davis ---
Jorge,
Not sure what the status of this package is at the moment, but I've been
fiddling with it for my own needs.
In particular, I've given it an initd script (albeit not a very good one), and
changed the s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #35 from Mitch Davis ---
Created attachment 597514
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=597514&action=edit
.ini file for uwsgi. Gets patched at package build time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #34 from Mitch Davis ---
Created attachment 597513
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=597513&action=edit
initd script for uwsgi
Should really be a systemd script, but I couldn't get that to work.
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #33 from Mitch Davis ---
Created attachment 597512
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=597512&action=edit
Spec file for uwsgi. Not suitable for production.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #32 from Mitch Davis ---
I fetched the .src.rpm and it rebuilt under F16 very easily.
There's no systemd/initd support. I have been working on that for myself. I
gave up on systemd because I couldn't get it to work. Initd is close
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #31 from Jorge A Gallegos ---
This was intended to go with f17, however there is a test koji build for f16 I
did before submitting it for f17.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=301059
You can also just rebuild the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
techto...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Terje Røsten changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #28 from Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
2012-03-22 07:44:30 EDT ---
I'd like to use uwsgi on EL6 but I'm unsure if I sh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Jorge A Gallegos changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System
2012-02-23 02:01:49 EST ---
uwsgi-1.0.4-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #24 from Jorge A Gallegos 2012-02-23 02:05:38 EST
---
Ok, I believe is all ready to go for f17, unless I'm missing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla 2012-02-22 08:28:38 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Also, a word of advice, don't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #21 from Jorge A Gallegos 2012-02-22 01:31:47 EST
---
Thanks a lot Steven!
Ok, I hope I changed all of the right f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Jorge A Gallegos changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #17 from Steven Dake 2012-02-19 14:47:17 EST ---
Official review:
[PASS] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #19 from Steven Dake 2012-02-19 14:49:45 EST ---
Jorge,
Congratulations on becoming a fedora packager. Please subm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #16 from Jorge A Gallegos 2012-02-19 13:50:03 EST
---
Ok put a new .src.rpm and .spec addressing the issues in the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #15 from Steven Dake 2012-02-18 19:16:46 EST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Gal
> >
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #14 from Steven Dake 2012-02-18 19:13:57 EST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Python2 p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #13 from Jorge A Gallegos 2012-02-18 14:03:16 EST
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Gal
>
> couple comments inline
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #12 from Jorge A Gallegos 2012-02-18 13:48:36 EST
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Python2 packages should buildrequ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #11 from Steven Dake 2012-02-14 11:13:46 EST ---
Gal
couple comments inline
(In reply to comment #9)
> I've been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #10 from Steven Dake 2012-02-14 11:02:19 EST ---
Python2 packages should buildrequires python2-devel
python3 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #9 from Gal Hammer 2012-02-14 09:48:06 EST ---
I've been asked to publish a full review report.
[PASS] MUST: rpmlin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #8 from Jorge A Gallegos 2012-02-07 01:38:48 EST
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Gal,
>
> Regarding ldconfig in %po
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #7 from Steven Dake 2012-02-05 11:37:49 EST ---
Gal,
As part of your sponsorship process please use the example rev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #6 from Steven Dake 2012-02-05 11:34:34 EST ---
Gal,
Regarding ldconfig in %post section:
From guidelines:
Whenev
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Gal Hammer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #4 from Steven Dake 2012-02-01 10:40:10 EST ---
Jorge,
Thanks for the prompt review of Bug #772608. You did a real
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #3 from Steven Dake 2012-01-30 09:11:05 EST ---
Jorge,
I will sponsor you as a packager after meeting certain crite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #2 from Jorge A Gallegos 2012-01-23 21:57:29 EST
---
Forgot to add the link to the koji scratch build, here it is:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156
--- Comment #1 from Jorge A Gallegos 2012-01-23 21:44:32 EST
---
Opening a new ticket as per this comment in this req
https://b
45 matches
Mail list logo