Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #26 from nucleo 2012-03-07 18:05:38 EST
---
*** Bug 757355 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Con
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #24 from Matthias Runge 2012-02-09
14:10:44 EST ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> He made me responsible for errors i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla 2012-02-09 13:56:41 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Added f17.
--
Configure bugm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
Bug 784950 depends on bug 784945, which changed state.
Bug 784945 Summary: Review Request: ktp-common-internals - Common intern
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
nucleo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #21 from nucleo 2012-02-09 09:47:50 EST
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> One thing that leaps out immediately, IMO:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #20 from nucleo 2012-02-09 09:45:25 EST
---
(In reply to comment #18)
> I think the only way, why the topic went of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt 2012-02-09 09:43:41
EST ---
One thing that leaps out immediately, IMO:
> Summary: Telepa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Spura 2012-02-09
09:29:01 EST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Now, as to the contentions as to the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter 2012-02-09 09:00:21 EST
---
re: comment #14
I've seen spectool -g fail before, but that's large
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #16 from nucleo 2012-02-09 07:57:52 EST
---
No more answers here.
If someone thinks that I approved package without
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #15 from nucleo 2012-02-09 07:52:11 EST
---
Did you read my first message?
rpmlint gives error if URL wrong.
I wrot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #13 from Matthias Runge 2012-02-08
08:17:07 EST ---
You're ignoring my points. I listed some of them.
You claim,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #12 from nucleo 2012-02-08 08:04:14 EST
---
I checked all items related to this package.
You still not provided any
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Runge 2012-02-08
07:59:06 EST ---
I read the list at [1] as follows: The reviewer is required to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #10 from nucleo 2012-02-08 07:49:33 EST
---
rpmlint output:
ktp-contact-applet.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_U
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #9 from nucleo 2012-02-08 07:36:57 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Review Guidelines list
>
> Things to check on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Runge 2012-02-08
07:35:14 EST ---
Review Guidelines list
Things to check on review [1]
In the ye
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #7 from nucleo 2012-02-08 07:29:48 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Still remaining, those 9 lines of 'review' (in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Runge 2012-02-08
03:41:10 EST ---
Yepp, Kevin's right. MUST comes from fedora-review tool. There's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2012-02-08 03:26:57
EST ---
> You didn't note e.g. the following
>
> [!]: MUST Package does no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2012-02-08 03:28:01
EST ---
(In other words, your MUST is only a SHOULD for a Fedora-only pack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
nucleo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
nucleo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784950
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
29 matches
Mail list logo
