https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Russell Harrison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #22 from Russell Harrison ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: rubygem-puppet-lint
New Branches: epel7
Owners: rharrison
I was reminded by a user that I forgot to request a el7 branch when RHEL7 was
relea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #21 from Russell Harrison ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: rubygem-puppet-lint
New Branches: el7
Owners: rharrison
InitialCC:
I was reminded by a user that I forgot to request a el7 branch when RHEL7
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-puppet-lint-0.2.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-puppet-lint-0.2.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-puppet-lint-0.2.1-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Russell Harrison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #16 from Russ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #14 from Russell Harrison ---
Updated files for the changes requested in comment 12
Spec URL:
http://rharrison.fedorapeople.org/package_review/rubygem-puppet-lint-0.2.1-3.fc18.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rharrison.fedorapeople.org/package_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Russell Harrison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #13 from Russell Harr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #11 from Russell Harrison ---
puppet-lint 0.2.1 has been released. I've update my package with the new
version.
Spec URL:
http://rharrison.fedorapeople.org/package_review/rubygem-puppet-lint-0.2.1-1.fc18.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rharri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #10 from Russell Harrison ---
puppet-lint 0.2.0 was finally released a few days ago. I'd been waiting for
this version to be released because of some bugs I'd encountered before
continuing with this review. I've updated my packages f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #9 from Russell Harrison ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Hi guys, I'd like to take this for a review, are you both ok with it? Could
> you please tell me, where the current versions of your SPEC and SRPM are?
> Thanks.
I've finally go
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #7 from Michael Scherer 2012-03-31 19:51:37 EDT ---
Why not co maintain, but i am far from being a ruby expert when
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #6 from Russell Harrison 2012-03-28
12:24:35 EDT ---
If you'd prefer we could co-maintain the package and use my ve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer 2012-03-27 01:41:41 EDT ---
I just did a rpm because I used it, but if you want to take care
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #4 from Russell Harrison 2012-03-26
18:54:45 EDT ---
As I mentioned earlier I had started packaging puppet-lint mys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #3 from Russell Harrison 2012-03-26
18:46:45 EDT ---
Ruby Gidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
Russell Harrison changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer 2012-03-24 08:53:05 EDT ---
Made the rpm compile on f17 ( but I am not sure it work fine on
27 matches
Mail list logo