[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-04-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-24 19:17:06 EDT --- picketbox-4.0.6-5.fc17 has been

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Ricardo Arguello ricardo.argue...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-23 11:00:19 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). --

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #5 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-22 13:48:46 EDT --- Package Review == Key: - = N/A

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-22 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #6 from Ricardo Arguello ricardo.argue...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 19:47:13 EDT --- Fixed! Spec URL:

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-16 06:00:44 EDT --- Ricardo, we need to remove geronimo-jpa from

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-16 07:33:05 EDT --- Created attachment 570584 --

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-16 11:22:06 EDT --- Please also remove the -a

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 --- Comment #4 from Ricardo Arguello ricardo.argue...@gmail.com 2012-03-17 00:54:53 EDT --- Done! Spec URL:

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Ricardo Arguello ricardo.argue...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 801680] Review Request: picketbox - Security framework for Java Applications

2012-03-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801680 Ricardo Arguello ricardo.argue...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added