https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
--- Comment #64 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
So does it have sense to persuede this review? You may get more attention if
you start Copr project at:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org
and reopen this review when the SElinux issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Daniel E. Wilson d...@bureau-13.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #63
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
--- Comment #59 from Daniel E. Wilson d...@bureau-13.org ---
As I recall the problem with SELinux was a build error. After all,
build-checkroot is a tool used in the Fedora build process.
For some reason the racket site had their file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
--- Comment #60 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Daniel E. Wilson from comment #59)
As I recall the problem with SELinux was a build error. After all,
build-checkroot is a tool used in the Fedora build process.
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
--- Comment #61 from Daniel E. Wilson d...@bureau-13.org ---
I have sent an e-mail about this to one of the upstream developers. I copied
you so that Eli would know to try to get the details from you since I don't use
SELinux.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|or...@cora.nwra.com |
--- Comment #56
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
--- Comment #57 from Jan Dvořák mor...@anilinux.org ---
I've successfully built my SRPM in COPR, disabling
/usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot.
Spec: http://anilinux.org/~mordae/racket/racket.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
--- Comment #58 from Robert Knight kni...@princeton.edu ---
I have an x86_64 system on which I could test the SELinux aspects of these
builds. I'm not sufficiently familiar with Racket to know whether there's a
run all tests operation that I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Daniel E. Wilson d...@bureau-13.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(d...@bureau-13.or |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Jan Dvořák mor...@anilinux.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mor...@anilinux.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
david.fe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.fe...@gmail.com
---
15 matches
Mail list logo