https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #18 from Matthi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #17 from Mi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #16 from Matthias Runge ---
Actually, I did upload version 9 to my webserver (just checked that). An older
version may reside in your browser cache?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #15 from Michael Scherer ---
You also forgot to update the spec on the webserver :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #14 from Matthias Runge ---
Ugh, forgot to post SPEC URL
SRPM:
http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-django-dpaste-0.2.4-9.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-django-dpaste.spec
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #13 from Matthias Runge ---
Michael, thank you for your review. You're right, pygments is required during
runtime, not at build time. Also I corrected the usage of
buildroot/RPM_BUILD_ROOT
updated
SPEC:
SRPM:
http://www.matthias-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #12 from Mi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #11 from Michael Scherer ---
Also, it seems that pygment is required at run-time, not at buildtime.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #10 from Mic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Runge 2012-05-02
15:27:42 EDT ---
-Release: 7%{?dist}
+Release: 8%{?dist}
License: BSD with adver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #8 from David Brown 2012-05-02 10:30:23 EDT
---
Bah but you forgot the en and de directories!
Add this please.
%d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge 2012-05-02
10:16:56 EDT ---
OK, partly agreed, but for other reasons.
[mrunge@noname SPECS]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #5 from David Brown 2012-05-02 09:59:22 EDT
---
The lang files get included if you use both the line above and the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #6 from David Brown 2012-05-02 10:01:52 EDT
---
Oh, forgot to mention...
Yes I wouldn't mind a more formal review
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Runge 2012-05-02
05:45:26 EDT ---
David, I'm not sure, (In reply to comment #3)
> Yeah I'd put som
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #3 from David Brown 2012-05-01 16:47:50 EDT
---
Yeah I'd put something like.
%{python_sitelib}/dpaste/locale
usin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge 2012-05-01
16:11:22 EDT ---
Thank you David,
yes, you're right, that patch is not necessary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
--- Comment #1 from David Brown 2012-04-30 11:08:54 EDT
---
You have a patch for rhel <= 5 but no %clean for rhel 5 you should
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816126
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
22 matches
Mail list logo
