https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|CANTFIX |DUPLICATE
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1045756 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1045756
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #30 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Hi Volker, I'm alive.
Licensing rights are unclear, so I can not pursue this bug, or is there someone
who can help me massively.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #29 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Martin?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #28 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #27 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to comment #26)
(In reply to comment #25)
the compilation fails now with the following error messages:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #24 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
domtt part in folder javascript was deleted, because it isn't needed any
longer.
Spec URL:
http://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-live.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #25 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
the compilation fails now with the following error messages:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Bug 821233 depends on bug 874238, which changed state.
Bug 874238 Summary: Review Request: DOM Tooltip (aka domTT) is a Javascript
widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874238
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||874238
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #23 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #22)
javascript dir comes apparently from a different project, license is ASL 2.0
vdr-live is licensed under GPLv2+, which is incompatible with ASL 2.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #22 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mru...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #16 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to comment #15)
%{vdr_apiversion} is used through the spec, but never defined. Interesting!
Esp.
Requires: vdr(abi)%{?_isa} = %{vdr_apiversion}
good morning Matthias, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #17 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Ah, I must have skipped that build requirement.
Sorry for the noise.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #18 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to comment #14)
I built it using koji first then used the prebuilt binaries to review.
you should use for q.e. for a local review the following command, take the
flags
-m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #19 from Sourav Basu sourav.t...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #14)
I built it using koji first then used the prebuilt binaries to review.
you should use for q.e. for a local review the following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #20 from Sourav Basu sourav.t...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to comment #18)
you should use for q.e. for a local review the following command, take the
flags
-m fedora-18-x86_64 or -m fedora-rawhide for the target arch
$
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #14 from Sourav Basu sourav.t...@yahoo.com ---
I built it using koji first then used the prebuilt binaries to review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #13 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
Sourav:
Buildroot used: fedora-16-i386
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -p -r -n
vdr-live-0.2.0-7.20121009git.fc18.src.rpm
I wonder how you built it though. See fedora-review's -m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #11 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
cannot reproduce the installation errors with a lokal review with:
[martin@localhost tmp]$ fedora-review -m fedora-18-x86_64-rpmfusion_free -n
vdr-live
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #12 from Sourav Basu sourav.t...@yahoo.com ---
I do not know why installation errors are not reproduced. I used:
[tumu@tumu i686]$ fedora-review -p -r -n
vdr-live-0.2.0-7.20121009git.fc18.src.rpm
Also another problem with your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #10 from Sourav Basu sourav.t...@yahoo.com ---
Here is the full review with all the manual checks done. If I made any mistake
please let me know.
However, this is an *informal* Review. I am not registered with the packagers
group, so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #9 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Sourav, you should complete the review, not paste the output with empty items.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Sourav Basu sourav.t...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sourav.t...@yahoo.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Sourav Basu sourav.t...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|18 |rawhide
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #8 from Sourav Basu sourav.t...@yahoo.com ---
I will post the review again with whatever remains unfulfilled.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|17 |18
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|vdr-live - An interactive |Review Request:
36 matches
Mail list logo
