https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|libmediainfo-0.7.67-2.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|libmediainfo-0.7.67-2.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libmediainfo-0.7.67-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmediainfo-0.7.67-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libmediainfo-0.7.67-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmediainfo-0.7.67-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libmediainfo-0.7.67-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmediainfo-0.7.67-2.el6
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #30 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #31 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/libmediainfo/master/libmediainfo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #33 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Ask upstream to fix this also:
W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libmediainfo/History.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #34 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Jérôme Martinez fixed file-not-utf8 in upstream. Shall be included in next
release.
Patch present but I don't want include it for one time only.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #35 from Jérôme Martinez jer...@mediaarea.net ---
upstream should give them license header.
License header of libmediainfo is the same form as the license header in libvpx
(Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #26 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
It requires mms support.
I think we can move this package to RPMFusion. I don't want to see package with
partial support.
Your opinion?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #27 from Jérôme Martinez jer...@mediaarea.net ---
It requires mms support.
MMS support was implemented several years ago for an unique customer who also
hacked a bit the last version of libmms for its own needs, and it is not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #28 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jérôme Martinez from comment #27)
It requires mms support.
MMS support was implemented several years ago for an unique customer who
also hacked a bit the last
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #29 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #17 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
PING.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #18 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
How you think should I am remove W: file-not-utf8 files or stay them as is
because them from upstream?
Soon I'll make 0.7.67 version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Well,
I always ping upstream about this and ask them to fix in the next version, and
leave the issue as-is...
You can convert them to utf8 but I think it's worthless to do that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #20 from Jérôme Martinez jer...@mediaarea.net ---
How you think should I am remove W: file-not-utf8 files or stay them as is
because them from upstream?
Sorry, I missed the comment about it.
I modified the file (one é was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #21 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
OK. I just created bugreport about it
https://sourceforge.net/p/mediainfo/bugs/832/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #22 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/libmediainfo/master/libmediainfo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #23 from Jérôme Martinez jer...@mediaarea.net ---
about embedded libraries:
- TinyXML-2: Debian decided to externalize it (they created a specific
TinyXML-2 package based on a GIT version), so there is a build option
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #24 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
TinyXML-2 I already use system.
Unicode?yes
Using ZenLib? system
Using libcurl?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #25 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
See md5 exception.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #16 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Any updates on this? ping vascom.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Bug 822328 depends on bug 822329, which changed state.
Bug 822329 Summary: Review Request: libzen - Shared library for libmediainfo
and medianfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Jérôme Martinez jer...@mediaarea.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|n...@jaur.su |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #13 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/libmediainfo/master/libmediainfo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #14 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Hmm...I have to review libzen first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(vasc...@gmail.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #10 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
My FAS id vascom
Yesterday I am approved to packager group.
Now I must do that? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
Right?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
This package hasn't got approved, you can't request a SCM without fedora-review
flag +, now I set it to ? indicates that I'm reviewing this package.
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #6 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
What should I do with
/usr/share/doc/libmediainfo-devel-0.7.62/Example/HowToUse_Dll.cs?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #7 from Nikita Klimov n...@jaur.su ---
(In reply to comment #6)
What should I do with
/usr/share/doc/libmediainfo-devel-0.7.62/Example/HowToUse_Dll.cs?
You can use iconv or similar tools.
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #5 from Nikita Klimov n...@jaur.su ---
In my opinion correct license is LGPLv2+.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #4 from Nikita Klimov n...@jaur.su ---
Hi Vasiliy,
I have a few comments:
- file /usr/share/doc/libmediainfo-devel-0.7.62/Example/HowToUse_Dll.cs in
libmediainfo-devel package is not valid utf-8;
- you can swap
find
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #3 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/libmediainfo/master/libmediainfo.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
--- Comment #2 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/libmediainfo/master/libmediainfo.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Nikita Klimov n...@jaur.su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@jaur.su
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
vasc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
53 matches
Mail list logo
