https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
gentlyweb-utils-1.5-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
gentlyweb-utils-1.5-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gentlyweb-utils-1.5-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
gentlyweb-utils-1.5-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gentlyweb-utils-1.5-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
--- Comment #5 from Matt Spaulding ---
Sebastian,
Very good review! Here is my official one. Mostly a rehash of what you have
already stated.
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gentlyweb-utils/1/gentlyweb-utils.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gentlyweb-utils/1/gentlyweb-utils-1.5-2.fc16.src.rpm
- changed SOURCE0 no more available at
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dyroff ---
I am not a package maintainer and I am still looking for a sponsor.
I used gentlyweb-utils_1.5.orig.tar.gz for the review. Hope that the upstream
file with the right sha256sum will become available again.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
hi Matt,
there is not any difference in the sources could be used both ...
but to simplify would keep the current version field (1.5)
and use the second file ... how do you feel?
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
Matt Spaulding changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mspauldin...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822831
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|gently
15 matches
Mail list logo
