Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
pack
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #20 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
I've put up a new -5 srpm as above along with an updated .spec file that uses
%{summary} in the binary packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #19 from Kal
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Commen
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #17 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
I have addressed all of the above, I believe.
The patch did not originate with me, so I don't want to be responsible for
submitting it upstream. The rest of the problems which can b
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #16 from Kalev Lember ---
Fedora review of mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-3.fc17.src.rpm 2012-11-16
+ OK
! needs attention
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-3.fc18.src.rpm \
mingw32-clucene \
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #15 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
I've renamed the packages and removed the boost and pthreads dependencies. The
library now builds a multi-threaded version.
Spec is at the same URL as above.
SRPM is at
http://dl.th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #14 from Kalev Lember ---
We normally don't do -devel / library package splits in the MinGW packages;
everything is shipped in a single package. So instead of one -devel package and
two library package like the native build has, the M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #13 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
The current naming scheme mimics the one by the native package:
upstream tarball: clucene-core
source package: clucene
binary packages: clucene-core / clucene-core-devel / clucene-contribs-lib
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Not the best forum for this query, I know, but Eric, why have you not asked
> to be a sponsor? You certainly appear to meet the requirements (maintain
> three packages, been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ---
Not the best forum for this query, I know, but Eric, why have you not asked to
be a sponsor? You certainly appear to meet the requirements (maintain three
packages, been a packager for six months, done fiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
Hi Greg,
I'm not a sponsor so unfortunately I can't help you with that part. Your best
chances to attract potential sponsors is by reviewing other packages so you can
demonstrate your skills with RPM pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #8 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Updated uploads:
http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/clucene/mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/clucene/mingw-clucene.spec
Koji results for build
http://koji.fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #7 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Still no review of my latest submission or a sponsor. Bumping for reminders?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #6 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/clucene/mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm
http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/clucene/mingw-clucene.spec
Uploaded new files as per the previous two posts.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #5 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > I have uploaded an updated spec and src.rpm file to
> > the same URLs as above if anyone else wants to take a look.
>
> Please bump the releas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have uploaded an updated spec and src.rpm file to
> the same URLs as above if anyone else wants to take a look.
Please bump the release and upload a new .src.rpm every time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #3 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The new approved MinGW packaging guidelines can be found at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MinGWCrossCompiler
>
> Some initial review comments:
> - Pleas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
Erik van Pienbroek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fedora-mingw@lists.fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
--
You are receiving th
31 matches
Mail list logo
