https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen ---
(It is kind of a shame that the package could not just be called ninja and
provide /usr/bin/ninja due to the existing ninja irc client package...)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
ninja-build-1.0.0-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
ninja-build-1.0.0-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
ninja-build-1.0.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
ninja-build-1.0.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ninja-build-1.0.0-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
ninja-build-1.0.0-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ninja-build-1.0.0-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
ninja-build-1.0.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ninja-build-1.0.0-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
Ben Boeckel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Mi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #11 from Ben Boeckel ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ninja-build/ninja-build.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ninja-build/ninja-build-0-0.4.20120605git54553d3.fc18.src.rpm
Switched to passing -p to install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@zarb.org
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
--- Comment #9 from Mich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|0x |Package Review
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Woehlke ---
Confirmed items from comment #4 are fixed (also that vim auto-syntax now works,
as advertised). The only outstanding issue I see is the missing manpage, which
IMO should not be a blocker.
Now... just need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
Ben Boeckel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dw...@infradead.org
Component|Pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #6 from Matthew Woehlke ---
Created attachment 592653
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=592653&action=edit
"patch" to fix vim auto-syntax
So, it's not too hard to fix the previous point; necessary vim commands
attac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #5 from Matthew Woehlke ---
vim syntax doesn't seem to work OOTB? (should it? or is this expected?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Woehlke ---
(MUST) rpmlint output is missing for latest packages. (In particular, the
latest changelog entry is missing the git hash, which I assume is why rpmlint
reports "incoherent-version-in-changelog 0-0.3.2012060
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Woehlke ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Add a Group tag.
Thanks.
> The permissions are due to my umask of 027. They'll be fine when built on
> Koji.
If koji fixes them, that's okay then...
> The .gz file is direct f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ninja-build/ninja-build.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ninja-build/ninja-build-0-0.3.20120605git54553d3.fc18.src.rpm
Add a Gro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116
Matthew Woehlke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mw_triad@users.sourceforge.
25 matches
Mail list logo
