Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #21 from Debarshi Ray debars...@redhat.com ---
Can we close this now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ta...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #16 from Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net ---
We are not shipping gnome-initial-setup in F18.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #17 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
no plans even to build this in f19 also? as SCM is already done, at least this
package can be built for f19.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #18 from Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net ---
It is going to be shipped in f19, which is the master branch. I didn't think I
had to explicitly specify that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #19 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
I already checkout master branch and can see spec file. What I was asking is
this
$ koji latest-pkg f19 gnome-initial-setup
Build Tag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #20 from Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net ---
That's because I haven't built it yet. I'll make builds available tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
halfline is not a valid FAS account and can be added later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com ---
New spec file / srpm (with Requires:gdm) here:
http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/gnome-initial-setup.spec
http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/gnome-initial-setup-0.2-2.fc18.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
It just needs to be decided if gnome-initial-setup has a runtime dependency
on gnome-session and polkit.
A runtime dep on gdm would probably be more to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I've updated the specfile to update to the 0.2 release.
Could you please also provide an updated srpm?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #6 from Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com ---
[rishi@kolache SPECS]$ rpmlint gnome-initial-setup.spec
gnome-initial-setup.spec:52: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
gnome-initial-setup.spec:52: W: macro-in-comment %{_sysconfdir}
0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com ---
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
use %global instead of %define
- license
GPLv2+ but in some cases the copyright headers are GPLv3+, but this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #8 from Debarshi Ray debarshi@gmail.com ---
Here is a Spec with most of the fixes:
http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-initial-setup.spec
It just needs to be decided if gnome-initial-setup has a runtime dependency on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #5 from Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net ---
I've updated the specfile to update to the 0.2 release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcla...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com ---
We are not replacing firstboot entirely here, at least not in F18, so an
obsoletes is not appropriate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the reply.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
24 matches
Mail list logo
