https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dwro...@ertelnet.rybnik.pl
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #10 from Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
koschei's scratch build of gdb-7.10.50.20151113-33.fc24.src.rpm for f24
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12414110
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bress...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Josh Bressers bress...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Karel Klíč kk...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
--- Comment #1 from Karel Klíč kk...@redhat.com ---
I feel the license might be an issue.
I interpret the license of this package (file LICENSE.txt) as BSD with
advertising because of the following section:
--
3. All advertising materials for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
--- Comment #2 from Josh Bressers bress...@redhat.com ---
Richard Fontana looked at this, here is his response:
Based on the information provided about the technical context I do not believe
there is a licensing conflict, despite the fact that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
--- Comment #3 from Karel Klíč kk...@redhat.com ---
I found a couple of minor issues. Fixing them would make the package better.
1. The spec file should not include the %clean section with rm -rf
%{buildroot}.
2. There should be no rm -rf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
--- Comment #4 from Josh Bressers bress...@redhat.com ---
OK, so this isn't going to work on RHEL6 as is. I spoke with the RHEL6 gdb
maintainer. The ability to auto-load commands doesn't exist there. I'm going to
think about how to best address
15 matches
Mail list logo