https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|java-xmlbuilder-0.6-1.fc19 |java-xmlbuilder-0.6-1.fc18
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
java-xmlbuilder-0.6-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-xmlbuilder-0.6-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
java-xmlbuilder-0.6-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-xmlbuilder-0.6-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a7mN7WOhKL&a=
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #19 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> - update to 0.6
resolved bundled iharder/base64.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bu
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
Bug 836945 depends on bug 957544, which changed state.
Bug 957544 Summary: Review Request: java-base64 - Java class for encoding and
decoding Base64 notation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957544
What
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||957544
--- Comment #18 fr
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #17 from gil cattaneo ---
FPC's trac link i broken or the page is currently offline
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redha
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #16 from Orion Poplawski ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Exceptions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #15 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Then you need to file for a bundling exception.
I'm sorry, how?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski ---
Then you need to file for a bundling exception.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cg
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> The blocker for me is bundling iharder/base64. That needs to be packaged
> separately.
the file is a customization version of iharder/base64... if i create anew
p
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski ---
The blocker for me is bundling iharder/base64. That needs to be packaged
separately.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/java-xmlbuilder.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/java-xmlbuilder-0.4-2.fc18.src.rpm
- removed superfluous from Javadoc subpackages Requires: jp
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #10 from Stanislav Ochotnicky ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > - Javadoc subpackages do not have Requires: jpackage-utils
> > Note: jpackage-utils requires are automatically generated by the
> > buildsystem
> > See
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/java-xmlbuilder.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/java-xmlbuilder-0.4-2.fc18.src.rpm
- install upstream license and notice files
java-xmlbuilder
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > - I believe the standard now is to *not* separately download and include a
> > license file. But upstream (http://code.google.com/p/java
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Apart from that there's also this from fedora-review (RC)
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - Maven packages should use new style packaging
> Note: If possible update your p
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #6 from Stanislav Ochotnicky ---
Apart from that there's also this from fedora-review (RC)
Issues:
===
- Maven packages should use new style packaging
Note: If possible update your package to latest guidelines
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
Stanislav Ochotnicky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||socho...@redhat.co
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski ---
- Still bundles iharder/base64
- Sorry about the - in the changelog, I guess that was old school
- I believe the standard now is to *not* separately download and include a
license file. But
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/java-xmlbuilder.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/java-xmlbuilder-0.4-1.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Problems -
> - Looks like this bundles a copy of net/iharder/base64/Base64.java from
> http://iharder.net/base64
> - Add "-" between name and version in %changelog e
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||847109
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836945
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
33 matches
Mail list logo
