https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
maven-indexer-4.1.2-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/maven-indexer-4.1.2-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Gerard Rya
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #8 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Tested on Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4329789
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #6 from Gerard Ryan ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The LICENSE file must be included in the SRPM and installed as %doc.
> This is required by the point 4. of the license.
It's already being installed as %doc, and by extension is incl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[!]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requireme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #4 from Gerard Ryan ---
Bundled jars removed from the source zip in the srpm so that the terms of their
licenses are not violated
Spec URL:
http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/maven-indexer/4.1.2-2/maven-indexer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> What's the recommended way to conditionally apply a patch based on release
> version?
Nevermind, just having the patch in the fedora branch is the obvious answer to
this. It builds w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #1 from Gerard Ryan ---
I think Patch1 is F17 specific, and I don't know if it will work at all with
f18, it shouldn't be necessary anyway because of the more advanced lucene
version.
What's the recommended way to conditionally apply
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||836850, 838722
--
You are receiving this
17 matches
Mail list logo
