Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
h
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
Maros Zatko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #19 from Maros Zatko ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: rubygem-slim
Short Description: Slim is a template language
Owners: mzatko
Branches: f17 f18
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #17 from Vít Ondruch ---
Thank you. I am fine with the .spec file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #16 from Maros Zatko ---
Excluded gem cache + check now goes after install.
Thanks for your patience.
Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim.spec
SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim-1.2.2-8.fc17.src.rpm
Description:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #15 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> It took me a while to notice I missed the %build section in sample from
> guidelines. Is it good enough, now?
Good. Thank you.
> Wrt noticing upstream - I'll investigate if it's w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #14 from Maros Zatko ---
It took me a while to notice I missed the %build section in sample from
guidelines. Is it good enough, now?
Wrt noticing upstream - I'll investigate if it's worth to send that patch.
Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to comment #11)
* You still do not own the %{gem_instdir}/test/ directory
* You fixed one failure but there are still other two errors + You should
reference issue sending the patch upstream or upst
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #12 from Troy Dawson ---
Very close. I am only getting one problem, it's in the rpmlint section.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: rubygem-slim-doc-1.2.2-6.fc19.noarch.rpm
rubygem-slim-1.2.2-6.fc19.noarch.rpm
rubygem-sli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #11 from Maros Zatko ---
fixed markdown test, owning my directories, is there something more to fix?
Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim.spec
SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim-1.2.2-6.fc17.src.rpm
Description: S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch ---
Thank you Maros. However, did you have a chance to investigate the Markdown
error and report it upstream? Would be nice to know what is the cause of the
error. That is the purpose of the test suite.
BTW You h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #9 from Maros Zatko ---
Now runs tests. Rebuilt against F17 and Rawhide in mock.
Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim.spec
SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim-1.2.2-4.fc17.src.rpm
Description: Slim is a template la
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch ---
Btw I am testing against F19/Rawhide and you should as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I don't run test suite because of missing dependencies.
I see just 3 test failures because of
1) missing creole
2) missing wikicloth
3) seems like bug in either test or slim itself,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #6 from Maros Zatko ---
Thank you for review, there is a updated spec & srpm.
I don't run test suite because of missing dependencies.
Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim.spec
SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Ví
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #4 from Troy Dawson ---
- LICENSE must be a doc
replace %{gem_instdir}/LICENSE with %doc %{gem_instdir}/LICENSE
- spec file must be in the format %{name}.spec
slim.spec should be rubygem-slim.spec
- 3 non-executable scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tdaw...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #3 from Maros Zatko ---
Thank you for review, there is a updated spec & srpm
Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/slim.spec
SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim-1.2.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
Description: Slim is a template language whose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #2 from Troy Dawson ---
Informal Review (continued):
I am unable to get this to build in mock or by hand. It fails at the end of
rpm building with
RPM build errors:
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rubygem-slim-1.2.2-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tdaw...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Tro
31 matches
Mail list logo
