https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #18 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Thanks spot.
Update spec and srpm here:
spec: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespace/mate-common.spec
srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #19 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
updated urls;
spec: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/mate-common.spec
srpm:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate/mate-common-1.4.0-3.src.rpm
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #20 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
one more try for srpm link:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/mate-common-1.4.0-3.src.rpm
Sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #22 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
So, I just looked closer at the gnome-common analog,
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gnome-common.git;a=blob;f=gnome-common.spec
and see some things we could... borrow here. :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #23 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Updated license. It is GPLv3+.
I will do the license review on a package by package basis. Most everything is
GPLv2+, GPLv3(+), lGPL as per perberos.
Added gnome-common to requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |dan.mas...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #25 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
My mistake, misunderstood. I'll remove that. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #17 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com ---
We probably cannot distribute nyan cat in source format either, without
permission from the copyright holder. I have not looked at the source code at
all, however, if only the image
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tcall...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #13 from Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com ---
Hi all,
I've looked around and it seems that nyan cat is indeed copyrighted and there's
currently 3 copyright holders:
1) 1 copyright holder for the animated gif;
2) 1 copyright
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #14 from Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com ---
Aditional Information:
You can disable 'nyan cat' during build time if you want, you need to add this
option to %configure (which you are neglecting currently):
%build
%configure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #15 from Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com ---
Dan,
I've found that also another person has a few very neat packages for Fedora;
You can use them to improve your specs if you want or even contact the original
author, tell him
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #16 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Nelson,
Thanks for the Nyan cat comment.
Regarding those packages, they are out of date and heavily patched.
I have been working with NiceGently. He is on vacation right now.
Thanks,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #6 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
All 21 RPMs are built. Will upload to fedora people and polish spec files for
you within 24 hours sir. Thanks for your help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
so, here's some suggested fixes:
http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/mate/
%changelog
* Fri Jul 13 2012 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 1.4.0-2
- omit Group: tag
- fix URL, Source0
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #10 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
All RPMs, SRPMs and SPEC files have been built and are uploaded here:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/
Please review.
This will need legal review as well.
It was brought to my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||840149
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||840149
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #12 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Thank you Rex and Mario.
Rex, I will work with your suggestions this weekend.
Mario, thanks for creating the tracker.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #3 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Thank you Rex. Care to do the review? ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
initial commments:
no need to BuildRequires: gcc
otherwise, the BuildRequires: are quite sparse, really, nothing?
and, using a /usr/local prefix here is (probably) not acceptable, and try
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839851
--- Comment #5 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
mate-common is the first basic component of mate so all that's required is
python auto make and gcc really. I can do fresh reinstall of fedora to double
check but I just did that. As for
31 matches
Mail list logo
