https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwak...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
blabling2 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marryli...@gmail.com
--- Comment #80 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Phil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||philreacher1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #79 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
timeline changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonbap2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #78 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
esther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prowritersexpe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #77
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
pipahaha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pipahah...@gmail.com
--- Comment #76 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Katharine J Walker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wkatharine...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Esther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||esthersherrywo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #74
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
JuliaFields changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fepey70...@febeks.com
--- Comment #73
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|sugar-kuku-5-0.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|sugar-kuku-5-0.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #67 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
sugar-kuku-5-0.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-kuku-5-0.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #68 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
sugar-kuku-5-0.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-kuku-5-0.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #63 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Can this be pushed to stable now and closed this review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|sugar-kuku-4-8.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #48 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-kuku/sugar-kuku.spec
SRPM URL:
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-kuku/sugar-kuku-4-6.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #49 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
spec file inside srpm does not match with above spec file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #50 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
Uploaded the correct SRPM
Spec URL: http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-kuku/sugar-kuku.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #51 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
koji scratch build failed for f20,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5783085
you need to have correct BR: sugar-toolkit and not sugar-toolkit-gtk3
Also, add correct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #52 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
Hi Parag,
I am using F18 box for packaging. There is no BR:sugar-toolkit package
error: Failed build dependencies:
BR:sugar-toolkit is needed by sugar-kuku-4-7.fc18.noarch
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #53 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
ah! I mean use it like this
BuildRequires: sugar-toolkit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #54 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
fixed the spec file as per comment #52
SRPM URL:
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-kuku/sugar-kuku-4-8.fc18.src.rpm
SPEC UEL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #58 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: sugar-kuku
Short Description: arithmetic education game
Owners: snavin
Branches: f18 f19
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #59 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #61 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
sugar-kuku-4-8.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-kuku-4-8.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
sugar-kuku-4-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-kuku-4-8.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danis...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(danis...@gmail.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #45 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Review:-
+ Package builds in mock successfully
+ rpmlint on rpms gave
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #44 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
SPEC file URL:
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-kuku/sugar-kuku.spec
SRPM URL:
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-kuku/sugar-kuku-4-7.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #42 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
Parag,
Do I need to add python2-devel here?
Btw, there is no update in the upstream since I packaged this. I hope there is
no issue with this package. :)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #43 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Got the request from Danishka again for this review as he has been sponsored
now. So, someone will be there for taking care of his work from Sugar group.
Danishka,
Yes. Check if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #37 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
Dear Parag and Steven,
I am not here to do master in reviewing or put my free time on reviewing.
I was suppose to package sugar activities for fedora which are having same
structure.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #38 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #37)
Dear Parag and Steven,
I am not here to do master in reviewing or put my free time on reviewing.
I was suppose to package sugar activities for fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #39 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
I am serious, we should find a way hire new volunteers for reviewing.
I will write to ambassadors list.
We must try to increase our resource base.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #40 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Somehow I got CC'd on this. I'm not really sure why, but a couple of points:
1) I've been on vacation for a month. For longer the lifetime of this package.
I'm not really back to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #41 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for your comment. Sorry for not mentioning why I cc'ed you. I know that
you have done a HUGE work(contribution) to Fedora and its Package Review
process and policies.
also, if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sd...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #36 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for your comment. I was of the same opinion. I have also reported
upstream developers of fedora-review that such things are happening by using
fedora-review tool. They assured me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #33 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
Parag,
Do you mind sponsoring, based on following information?
Created 8 packages including this package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841239
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #32 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #5 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
forgot the %defattr(-,root,root,-). fixed it
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-kuku/sugar-kuku.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
I can still see defattr in spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
also, start reviewing other packages. This will help you to get sponsorship
soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #8 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
my bad forget to delete the entry but modify the changedlog
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-kuku/sugar-kuku.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #9 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
do i need to run fedora-review on my system when I am reviewing a package?
i try to run the fedora-review on my own package but could not get an result.
looking for a guide.
i used the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #10 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
fedora-review -b bug-number
And read man fedora-review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
I am still not in support for any automated tool for a package review. Good to
look package manually and learn the packaging by finding problems and
suggesting solutions.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #14 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
why you revoked the fedora-review+ flag? Don't want me to review this package?
I have never used fedora-review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #15 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
i think it was happened when we both commented at the same time.
i did not purposely change or revoked the fedora-review+ flag.
i was suppose to reply to your comment#11. Really sorry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #17 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
fedora‑cvs if not active for me and i can't set fedora-cvs flag to ?
'If you are newly sponsored member of the Fedora Packager group you might have
to wait an hour before you will get
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #18 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
previous comment should be correct as follows
fedora‑cvs is not active for me and i can't set fedora-cvs flag to ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #19 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
I have not yet sponsored you. That is why the next step I asked to do
reviews. Once you do sufficient say 5 different in detail package reviews, I
will sponsor you. That is reason I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #20 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
i got a mail that saying
'Thank you for applying for the packager group.
Welcome to the Fedora packager group. Please continue the process from:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #21 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
The Sponsor who want to sponsor contributor need to add his fas name in
packager group. As I will sponsor you, I have added your request for packager
group and you got automatic email
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #22 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
anyway how these approved packages moving to build system?
and can i use the koji?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #23 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
and why I can't run fedora-review against this approved bug?
I have try to review my own package, just for testing.
But I do not get proper report.
This the result.
fedora-review -b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #24 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #22)
anyway how these approved packages moving to build system?
Once you raise fedora-cvs? flag, someone will create git module for your
package in dist-git by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #25 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
I ran fedora-review command on this bug. I used fedora-review first time and it
executed successfully.
INFO: Done(/home/parag/Downloads/840551/sugar-kuku-4-6.fc17.src.rpm)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #26 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
i know but was it was not working on my Fedora 17 x86_64 box?
i was using it as local user.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #27 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
if you can understand me correctly,
is there a person who can move this to the build system other than myself ?
I won't available for next week but i want to get the work do.
Since we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #28 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
You are asking me to get you sponsored based that you don't have time to review
other packages? What if all new people coming with this mindset. Then, we will
endup with so many package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #29 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
From
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Submitting_quality_new_packages
The sponsors that look at new package submissions often ask new packagers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #30 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
i came with a spirit to work on packaging.. Specially had an idea of packaging
all the activities for fedora.
but i feel.. i should give up this.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #31 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Whoever want to learn packaging, he will try different packages or review
different kind of package like perl, python, gnome or library packages. I think
if anyone knows well packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Review:
+ koji scratch build
-http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4246775
- rpmlint on rpms gave
sugar-kuku.noarch: W: no-documentation
sugar-kuku.noarch: E:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #3 from Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com ---
Fixed all suggestions
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-kuku/sugar-kuku.spec
http://snavin.fedorapeople.org/packages/sugar-kuku/sugar-kuku-4-4.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
--- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Remove %defattr(-,root,root,-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840551
Danishka Navin danis...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: main |Review Request:
89 matches
Mail list logo
