https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
cura-storage-0.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cura-storage-0.1-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
--- Comment #14 from Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com ---
cura-storage-0.1-3.fc18 is heading also to rawhide. Thanks everybody for review
git, and Jon, sorry again to rush this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Tomas Smetana tsmet...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jonstan...@gmail.com|tsmet...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
--- Comment #7 from Tomas Smetana tsmet...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jonstanley@gmail. |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Tomas Smetana tsmet...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
--- Comment #11 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Tomas! Sorry I didn't get to this in time :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
--- Comment #4 from Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com ---
I have indeed no intention to run this package on RHEL5, so I removed
python_sitelib and python_sitearch and CFLAGS as suggested.
Regarding Anaconda stability, I'm working with Anaconda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonstan...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
--- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com ---
In general a very simple spec that looks good, but seems somewhat weird. I
guess I should ask what the intended use of this package is, because it looks
like it uses storage stuff from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844963
Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
18 matches
Mail list logo
