https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845110
--- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Would it be possible to also to have this package for f17?
>
> I'm annoyed even at having to have this in HEAD. I don't want to expand it.
Hmm, ...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845110
--- Comment #8 from Tom Lane ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Would it be possible to also to have this package for f17?
I'm annoyed even at having to have this in HEAD. I don't want to expand it.
AFAICS the actual use-case for this is only to s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845110
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845110
Tom Lane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845110
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
Flags|fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845110
--- Comment #4 from Tom Lane ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: libpng12
Short Description: Old version of libpng, needed to run old binaries
Owners: tgl
Branches: f18
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845110
Tom Lane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845110
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845110
--- Comment #2 from Tom Lane ---
Hm, can you tell libpng is a really ancient package :-)
All changes sound fine to me, specfile and SRPM at the above URLs updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845110
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
10 matches
Mail list logo
