https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-hashr-0.0.21-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-hashr-0.0.21-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
--- Comment #13 from Fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-hashr-0.0.21-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-hashr-0.0.21-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-hashr-0.0.21-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-hashr-0.0.21-3.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-hashr-0.0.21-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-hashr-0.0.21-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||rubygem-hashr
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Vít Ond
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Thank you for your suggestion, I really appreciate it.
All issues should be addressed:
Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-hashr/rubygem-hashr.spec
SRPM URL:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/ru
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Fixed:
> * Use %global instead of %define
> * Test suite
> * License
> * -doc subpackage
> * Please use the new RubyGems packaging macros
Thank you.
> ad /Please consider to use "%i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-hashr/rubygem-hashr.spec
SRPM URL:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-hashr/rubygem-hashr-0.0.21-2.fc17.src.rpm
Fixed:
* Use %global instead o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch ---
* Use %global instead of %define
- Unless there is any special need, the %global macro should be used in place
of %define according to FPG [1]
* Test suite
- It would be nice to execute a test suite of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
15 matches
Mail list logo
